Riamus
Well-known member
No, Paradox isn't live service. Those are just DLC. The fact that the base games have minimal features compared to what the games have if you have all the DLC doesn't change that. You can play the base games without ever buying a DLC if you want to. I have played a variety of these and although they are better when using DLC (at least some DLC), they play just fine without the DLC. DLC are optional. A live service game may have optional DLC (such as cosmetics -- WoW pets and mounts, for example), but those aren't why the game is live service. The game is live service because of either a subscription model or a model where you have to purchase things in order to play and/or complete a game. Basically, you have to keep paying to play. Even if 7D2D added a ton of DLC, we could keep playing the vanilla game (or modded game) without ever buying a DLC. That isn't a live service model.I woudn't agree about Pardox game - there are even guids which DLC are necceseary - i'm not into Paradox yet usualy they games are very bare bone during release then pretty much some of their DLC are must have + there are subscribtions for DLC
Modding is possible for Deep Rock Galaxy which is live service game.
Well : dlc outfit = for me sounds like typical Life service element. For example - CoD skin bundle are sold as DLC becauise... of Steam reasons.
What about events? Well - it's not crucial: Cod Ghost if i good remember didn't have any events yet had tons of skins to buy.
So : while we can make disscuse about definition yet - for me you have two "types" of game - classic ones like Lord of the ring battle of middle earth or darkest dungeon : finished game or 1 or 2 expansion and you know it will be "complete" at some point in close future and live service game - a lot of planned dlc/ microtransations and nobody know when it will end - HOI, Patch of Excile
yet:
outfits dlc? this in step into @%$#ty direction like Call of Duty or Dynasty warriors.
I doesn't mind expansion packs: yet - if they at first add outfits it's bad sign. Plus this Spinoff which looks like f2p mobile game. i think that TFP starts to follow TB patch which is realy bad ( check NMRIH2 situation)
And, no... the number of DLC doesn't turn a game that isn't live service into one that is. You don't go from a game not being live service with 5 DLC to one that is live service because they now have 6 DLC, for example.
Now, if you want to complain about games having a ton of DLC... that's fine. But they aren't automatically live service games. You can drop that phrase rather than trying to use it as an argument and instead just complain about DLCs in general and you argument would be fine. You just can't use some phrase people don't like (live service) and apply it to an argument that isn't about that phrase as a way to "improve" your argument. It'll just make your argument invalid. It would be the same as complaining about subscription based games when talking about a game that is free, but has microtransactions that feel required in order to play the game. Both mean you pay money regularly, but subscription is required and microtransactions are not, even if they feel like they are required. So you can't call a game without a subscription a "subscription based game" just because it has microtransactions. Use of proper terminology is important.