Randomdude
New member
I don't believe that they are being coerced in any way. I thought that they could be convinced and even change their minds with logic and reason by listening to their users. You might have convinced me otherwise.Wrong. You’ve fallen into the misconception that just because something is posted by forum members that the devs are somehow influenced against their wills to do it. Faatal, himself, quipped that the only safe place in the game should be the main menu.
(I used the digging zombies as an example. This post is not about digging, I know you know this, but making sure.)
About the AI, I know its in super early stages and that work is just beginning. My point about closing loopholes is that you could see it as fataal vs the internet. Eventually his AI will be destroyed and exploited as it would be impossible to make one that lasts forever. At what point would he say "It's good enough, lets move to the end game" (whatever that is)At the same time faatal IS interested in seeing all the tactics to fool the AI not so he can counter each and every instance but so he can make design changes to get them to act more naturally. For example, he saw some exploits showing ways to make zombies fall and run around to just fall again. He brainstormed that maybe in A18 zombies might swipe at blocks as they fall eventually destroying the exploitive pathway that the player set up and allowing them to choose a different one not prepared by the player.
I stand by my point of defining what is a game breaking "loophole" and understanding that there are some things that are not worth their time as players will just find "another way".