Is this legit?

"Fine art prints." That's rich. AI generated "art" will never be art.
I mean, it seems they may have used AI for some of the game's deco blocks, but those in the picture above don't seem to be. Their logo has been around forever, that Working Stiffs calendar has been around for several updates now IIRC, and the other is a real dog from one of the devs/testers I think it was.
 
I use my console as an ashtray and to hold my empty pop cans. It's a ps4 btw. As long as sony and microsoft keep handicapping the game requirements the console version of this game will always be inferior. I can play any alpha and experimental, I can mod anything I want. All of this from an office chair instead of a couch, ok I am jealous of your chesterfield play style. Wish I could lay in bed on the PC. Anyways not to beat you up about it but steam version is far superior, save up 3 months, get a decent pc and join the dark side. Let's see your console make weaboo AI Art for you.
 

Attachments

  • Create an anime-styl.png
    Create an anime-styl.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 3
Newsflash: AI-phobia now officially accepted by the UN as an illness


:cool:;)
AI generated, so-called "art" is trampling the proprietary rights of artists all over the world. I remember a colleague (during my days as a web developer) saying, "We can take anything we like from the Web. As long as we modify it, it's ours." Well, no it wasn't and...isn't.

That's what AI companies are doing. Same principle. AI produces a mash-up of artists' creations and spits it out as something "new" with no compensation to the actual artist(s) of the elements of said mash-ups whatsoever. Regulations haven't kept up with the technology, which is why a financial bubble has formed around tech companies which, when it bursts, is going to make the subprime mortgage crisis look like a blip on the radar.

There is no law against using AI-generated material in video games or anywhere else, so the makers of video games and movies and advertisments and trailers aren't doing anything legally wrong by using it any more than they're doing anything wrong by purchasing game engine store assets, which would be preferable to using AI, imo, as those assets are created by artists who are being compensated for their work...though I'm sure there's a lot of shenanigans going on there, too.

TFP's artists are producing the models and textures based on AI-generated slop. So, it's certainly not a diss on their work to bring the models and textures based on AI-generated slop to life, so to speak, in the game. They're doing a good job of that, I think.
 
I mean, it seems they may have used AI for some of the game's deco blocks, but those in the picture above don't seem to be. Their logo has been around forever, that Working Stiffs calendar has been around for several updates now IIRC, and the other is a real dog from one of the devs/testers I think it was.
AI is good for video game studios as it can be used for automating repetitive tasks and the like. The models and textures of creatures, e.g. the former mummies and Yetis, were based on AI-generated images, but the models and textures themselves were created by TFP's staff.

Again, it's not a diss on their work. They've worked ■■■■■■■ those models and textures. It's the stuff going on elsewhere, e.g. OpenAI, that is highly questionable. Jeffelon Zuckergates Estate, indeed. :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top