PC V3.0 Dead Hot Summer Dev Diary

@faatal

I just thought of something. It is based on @Kalen 's post above, and @Grandpa Minion 's
earlier, and your response to @Old Crow with the Code example: AAAJABJACJADJARFBNC.

Can the new format, since it is a static string, that is generated upon configuration save, be
used as or within a Secure Hash Algorithm. To address, each one of the validation and sharing
instances. Also for cross-play and multiplayer single platform on console.

Sort of how the game already can differentiate between modded and unmodded when logging
on now.
 
permadeathpayday said:
Streamers Friday evening, the rest of us Monday. Honestly, I'd happily pay to be in that Friday group
Click to expand...
That's not how it works. You apply to be part of the Content Creator Program and if accepted, you get to stream on that Friday; if not, then you wait like everybody else.
It's only a few days of waiting and the Friday release is kind of considered like a pre-release of the 3.0 Experimental as they might discover bugs that they would fix before the Monday experimental release.
 
faatal said:
It should not be working like that. Two of our testers are trying it now.

When you join a server, there is not a sandbox setting UI for you to even change anything. They come from the server.
Post automatically merged:


And speaking of version numbers, you will note that they have an extra digit now. 3.0 is 3.0.0. Small bug fix and tweak releases will now be 3.0.x. Smaller feature updates 3.x.0. Major features x.0.0.
Click to expand...
I did notice that and thats interesting I would be interested to see how it goes

It would be nice if we could hide it! Someday
 
Jost Amman said:
Welcome to the industry standard!
Click to expand...
So if the middle number is changed, it's adding a feature, but it's backward compatible.
If the last number is changed it's making a patch and backward compatible.
If the first number is changed a new install is needed.

I vote for emojis, icons, and arrows after watching that.

The famous story that Gerber made a disastrous advertising mistake by sending baby food to Africa—
where consumers supposedly thought the jars contained ground-up babies because of the baby
illustration on the label

The real problem was that the area that they had sent it to, many of the people were illiterate.
So the they, removed the labels, and re-stamped the jars with a picture of what was inside. So
the 2 to 4 percent they spent on labeling and advertising . got thrown in the garbage
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top