Roland
Moderator
Yes but there is a difference between the snoozefest gameplay of a single POI vs an entire biome that makes up more than half the play space of the entire map. I would agree with you that having threats be an aspect of settlements WOULD be better and helping a settlement to defend from a horde attack would be much much better gameplay than simply paying the community leader rent to stay on a patch of land that keeps you 100% safe.I'm sorry but isn't that just moving the safety area? Underground was safe but then you said you want to go underground but need threats to make it more fun.
What if I say I want to live in a settlement but I want threats in there to make it more fun for me. Seems like the same argument. As a matter of fact i'd argue a zombie horde decending on an npc settlement and you helping defend it in a massive battle sounds like way more fun than sitting underground and just defending yourself.
Just my 2c
But given the chance of having a more interesting underworld at the cost of a more boring POI I would take that in a heartbeat even if I felt some disappointment that settlements could have been so much more. And if the devs are going to accomodate those who want a safe haven for their playstyle, I think it is a good compromise as it is much easier to just not pay the cost for safety in a settlement than it is just to not play underground.