Okay well by that logic you don't get to interject when people find something funny.
no, you're misrepresenting my point. You ARE able to interject that something IS offensive - but you don't get to tell people that something is "ok" and that something they find offensive isn't.
Still don't get it? Imagine a comedian tells a produce joke and you laugh because it was a good joke. Then someone next to you in the crowd (who clearly has never planted a seed in his life) says "That's not funny, it's offensive to farmers and demeans the work that they do".
See here's what I don't get, you absolutely butcher and misrepresent my point...and then perfectly illustrate it right after...This is exactly right. That person may well be offended and have every right to be offended. YOU don't get to use the half-a** excuse "oh, it was just a joke"
Then they shoot the comedian for being a farmist piece of garbage and burn the whole theater down.
uh-huh. sure.
You seem to assume that the people saying that the name is insensitive are offended FOR others. That we're trying to speak for people who can't speak for themselves. We aren't, I'm not. I'M offended by the insensitivity. It's making light of a neurological disorder. A neurological disorder that is oft misunderstood and mocked and mistreated due to blanket, harmful, or untrue stereotypes. Stereotypes perpetrated by situations like this skill name.
There. Now I've told you WHY it's insensitive. It makes light of something unfortunate. It invites people to chuckle at and make a joke of something that people struggle to deal with. It doesn't directly affect me. But it absolutely INDIRECTLY affects me, and an unbelievably vast number of other people. Making light of this is symptomatic of a culture that demeans and jokes about differences and the struggles of others. When later on, someone mocks and jokes about something that you, personally, might struggle horribly with, know that defending the behavior when it was aimed at others might directly lead to others leaving you all on your own when it's your personal struggle.
Is it huge infraction? some catastrophically insensitive thing that will hurt a group of people for years to come? Not in the slightest...but it's still insensitive, and in this particular case UNBELIEVABLY EASY to rectify....so...why not rename it? Why not rename it because if nothing else, this post shows that there certainly are people that DO find it insensitive. Unless the naming of the perk and choosing not to name it shows exactly what the powers-that-be in this game think of people who are bothered by something in the game - which is the case they've shown time and again, with the stripper zombie, with the "rude" trader, etc.
So we keep chiming in. Because whether they change it or not, people who are bothered by it can at least come to the forums and see that not everyone brushes it off, and that some people will call it out when they see it.