Please reconsider how to handle the JaWoodle thing.

Wording is key in perception.
"he was unwilling to absorb the full financial and performance cost of their mistake." reads already different while still being factual equal.
"TFP was unwilling to share financial and performance cost of their mistake." reads very different while putting the blame on the other side.

AI is indeed in who's bubble it's trained and how you use prompts. Meanwhile it is up to use how we judge the outcome and never take it for an absolute truth.

(My personal AI has a different outcome, Post-notice fault: TFP/BHVR 80% — JaWoodle 20% 🫠 )
The only things 7 Days to Die I do with ChatGPT is coding for my mods. And a lot of what we work on is the poor performance of the game and correcting features that I think are executed poorly (like the brightness setting which we fixed). So that might actually bias it against the competence of TFP. I've never discussed the community.

What I did was give it all the pertinent evidence and asked it for a percentage of blame. I also had it set to high intelligence, so it took a long time for it to thorough scan the evidence and formulate an answer.

I assume you simply let your AI solely scan the internet...aka Reddit...and it probably gave you an answer quickly.
 
I read the whole thing with way too much attention for an AI post (like, I might've actually read it once in full :P ). But this bit seems either hallucinated or entirely unrelated? Special access .. "special" is only in the EULA in the context of DLC and other online features, and PRE-RELEASE is mentioned only as a complete ban on transferring PRE-RELEASE SOFTWARE. These don't seem related to this case in any way..?
I copy and pasted your post to ChatGPT and asked it if you were right. But no matter how many times I asked it to answer, it kept on responding with:
"I refuse to answer anything that comes from an adult human that still uses pictures to communicate".

I've never seen it do this before.
 
Back
Top