PC LBD talk is RIGHT HERE

No.
I went back as far as the LBD is DEAD post it is true but what triggered it was me realizing after I posted about it and imagining the discomfort I might feel on Monday when Madmole returns to find even more pages of LBD talk (and with my participation) after he had already asked for it to cease and after I had already stated once weeks ago already that further discussion of it needed to be taken elsewhere. I got caught up in the discussion because it is interesting and I enjoy thinking about design in games but it was not appropriate for that thread after so many requests from Madmole to be done with it.

I look forward to getting back to a discussion of it once everyone has finally vented enough about the moderator action to enforce what Madmole asked for but which people ignored.
Click to expand...
Sorry Roland :D

 
The skills you needed to grind that weren't fun like hugging cactuses to raise armor skill or medicine skill by spamming painkillers , could've easily just been made into perks and that would've resolved the issue entirely. It's stated that this current system was introduced to keep people from having to grind boring skills ,yet I feel that killing poorly made zombies ,the most boring part of this game so it ruined the game for me entirely.

I can't progress without doing the thing I enjoyed the least. Dont get me wrong ,I still enjoyed my fair share of zombie killing during the 7 day horde and the occasional wandering horde. Now I have to actively grind zombies to get better at everything and it gets boring FAST . At least before you had varied activities and if something bored you then you could move on to something else.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Areyou

serious

???

530 voices is "just an interest poll"? That is like about 1/10th of active players. The fact that this did nothing to change their mind (coupled with all the arguments on the forums) should be concerning.

The low rating is because the game is just less fun.

I said it like 10 times already. It has nearly no replayability, is stripped of its original charme and core features got changed for the worse.

All related to the perk system.

But I do grant you that a big chunk is also about beeing frustrated with tfps for continously ignoring fan feedback on important matters and doing their own thing. Which is a double edged sword.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/251570/7_Days_to_Die/#app_reviews_hash

They all talk how the game has lost its charm and is just a simple xp grind. And it will stay this way with this perksystem. Because even the "xp by time" approach i just read about makes this game boring because you have to wait until you can level.

I am a quick player. Some ppl have a bow and a little hut when I have an ak best armor and 40k dukes. But with this approach I will be held back until I have played as much as that one guy who just started and doesnt know how to find ressources.

As soon as you make it "perk" or "point" bound, it will be tied to xp. And xp will be the main currency for progress. There is no way around it.
Click to expand...
Thanks for reminding me to go downgrade my Steam review.

https://steamcommunity.com/id/DrGrue/recommended/251570

Which has 530 responses out of 2,500,000 game units sold (that's a response rate of 0.02%). Let's not pretend that it in any way allows those of us who support(ed) LBD to claim the "We speak for the Majority" tag.......
Click to expand...
The vast majority of those copies are collecting digital dust, you do not need to talk to all of them.

The forum here is just about the best place you could possibly get a unbiased random sample of active users.

Go educate yourself on how survey samples work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survey_sampling

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for reminding me to go downgrade my Steam review.
https://steamcommunity.com/id/DrGrue/recommended/251570

The vast majority of those copies are collecting digital dust, the forum here is just about the best place you could possibly get a sample of active users.

Go educate yourself on how survey samples work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survey_sampling
Click to expand...
Perhaps you should consider some of that education for yourself too?

So, you won't accept the 530 out of 2,500,000 is a valid comparison?

How about 530 out of the 131,000 forum accounts here? (Or a response rate of 0.4%).

Now, how many of those 530 responses are from people playing A17? Oh, that's right, we don't know, since the poll didn't include that option. How many of the 530 responses represent people still playing the game? Oh yeah, we don't know that either do we.

Let's also not ignore the fact that there were only 129 responses in favour of "I prefer a system that is "completely learn by doing", (that by the way, was how I voted) or the fact that the the poll included many voting options in favour of the current system, which also garnered many votes, or the fact that it was a multiple choice poll further muddying the results up, since you have absolutely no idea which options each of the 530 respondents ticked or the fact that none of the options on the poll even secured a majority of this tiny slices of responses in the first place!

Yet, despite all that, you're going to bang on about LBD being the majority preference and really sit there and tell me I need education on how to read a poll?

/facepalm

 
Perhaps you should consider some of that education for yourself too?
So, you won't accept the 530 out of 2,500,000 is a valid comparison?

How about 530 out of the 131,000 forum accounts here? (Or a response rate of 0.4%).

Now, how many of those 530 responses are from people playing A17? Oh, that's right, we don't know, since the poll didn't include that option. How many of the 530 responses represent people still playing the game? Oh yeah, we don't know that either do we.

Let's also not ignore the fact that there were only 129 responses in favour of "I prefer a system that is "completely learn by doing", (that by the way, was how I voted) or the fact that the the poll included many voting options in favour of the current system, which also garnered many votes, or the fact that it was a multiple choice poll further muddying the results up, since you have absolutely no idea which options each of the 530 respondents ticked or the fact that none of the options on the poll even secured a majority of this tiny slices of responses in the first place!

Yet, despite all that, you're going to bang on about LBD being the majority preference and really sit there and tell me I need education on how to read a poll?

/facepalm
Click to expand...
Did I design the survey? No.

Go female dog at Roland about how he set it up.

Would I have designed the survey differently if it were me? Sure.

Is it perfect? No, but it is the best preference information we currently have.

You are the one who said "majority", not me.

 
No, you can't compare the poll results to 2.5 million. The 2.5 million are mostly people from way beforehand.

It's like saying McDonald's sold to 10 Billion customers since it opened, and therefore the McGarbage sandwich they introduced this year is a great sandwich.

 
No, you can't compare the poll results to 2.5 million. The 2.5 million are mostly people from way beforehand.It's like saying McDonald's sold to 10 Billion customers since it opened, and therefore the McGarbage sandwich they introduced this year is a great sandwich.
Click to expand...
So what can you compare it to? That poll is an interesting data point, no more, no less. That's all it is.

Ultimately, it lends zero credence to arguments for or against LBD, as the poll had far too few respondents, zero information on who the respondents were, or a clear cut, mutually exclusive, option between the current system and LBD for there to be any meaningful conclusions drawn from it.

I hope some day, some clever modder can re-introduce LBD. I hope some day TFP will make it easier for such a re-introduction to occur, even though they are now definitely, almost certainly irreversibly, set on the perk system, but there is no meaningful data whatsoever for me to say that my own preferences are supported by anything other than a subset of the forums regular and active posters, which is itself an incredibly tiny subset of all the forum accounts, which is itself a very tiny subset of all the games sales.

If the best argument for LBD is that it has some sort of general player preference, then LBD is deader than Elvis.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Did I design the survey? No.Go female dog at Roland about how he set it up.

Would I have designed the survey differently if it were me? Sure.

Is it perfect? No, but it is the best preference information we currently have.

You are the one who said "majority", not me.
Click to expand...
Well, if you didn't say majority, then my apologies. Certainly others have claimed LBD has "majority" support, something which I think is a completely invalidated claim.

I still say though, that the poll was an interesting exercise (and by the way, that's all it was really designed to be I think), but as a source material for drawing any meaningful conclusions from, it's unrecoverably flawed.

 
So what can you compare it to? That poll is an interesting data point, no more, no less. That's all it is.
Ultimately, it lends zero credence to arguments for or against LBD, as the poll had far too few respondents, zero information on who the respondents were, or a clear cut, mutually exclusive, options between the current system and LBD for their to be any meaningful conclusions drawn from it.

I hope some day, some clever modder can re-introduce LBD. I hope some day TFP will make it easier for such a re-introduction to occur, even though they are now definitely, almost certainly irreversibly, set on the perk system, but there is no meaningful data whatsoever for me to say that my own preferences are supported by anything other than a subset of the forums regular and active posters, which is itself a very tiny subset of all the forum accounts, which is itself a very tine subset of all the games sales.

If the best argument for LBD is that it has some sort of general player preference, then LBD is deader than Elvis.
Click to expand...
The survey suggests that a Hybrid system is what the majority of active players in this forum wants. The same active players that feel strongly enough about this game to discuss it with others.

I am not a fan of LBD-only. Like I mentioned before in this pseudo-thread, I believe a Hybrid system is what we should be looking at and not going back and forth with weak arguments for LBD-only or Perks-only.

Also, like I said before, the way this thread is titled, and also the premise post that goes along with it, will only result in more people trying to either defend LBD or be against it... when neither of these should even be the focus here.

I would be careful with dismissing poll results, especially when they are started by moderators. Otherwise, you are saying the moment you post them, "Vote here for absolutely no reason whatsoever because it won't mean jack"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As Roland has pointed out, it was a poll on these forums, a subset of the users on these forums that bothered to respond to the poll, which is itself a subset of all owners of the game (the poll didn't get two and a half million responses after all).
When LBD was there to be argued, I was happy to argue for it, but, on the basis of my own personal preferences, not some imagined (accurate or not is moot) majority stance.

Now that LBD is gone, and seems never to come back, well, I have to accept I've lost the argument and it's time to move on.
Click to expand...
Well yes, any poll is done on a subset of a population, from which a subset replies etc. And there is a chance that it might not even be accurate but it is something over nothing (nothing being random speculations), so it's not exactly imaginary. But ok, the majority argument is more of an empty argument because the majority might as well be full of bs.

As for moving on, from my experience, what is not really popular dies out eventually. At any case there is no harm in discussing about it in the proper sections. Imagine if the same was said for the "underground safety" debate over the years (yes MM had expressed a vague intention to do something about it but there were no news for a long time). Who knows, perhaps someday in the future TFP decide to add some LBD elements, perhaps not.

It is equally annoying to those if us that have made that statement have the LBD crowd take this as some sort of narrow and literal statement about why they did not like LBD. That statement is an example of the real problem with LBD - to level a stat you MUST do a set of activities that most of which will not be fun. It is not a matter of hugging cacti that is the problem, the problem is that I MUST get hit to progress my character. That is counter productive and not fun. There is NO WAY to level most skills in a fun manner.
Click to expand...
Well if the one who wrote this doesn't like it to be taken literally, then perhaps they could try being literal.

Seriously though, the hugging cacti example is an example of using a static controllable damage source which doesn't provide any risk to level up a skill. If it's in some way metaphorical, what are you trying to compare it with? Being hit by a zombie which can infect you, make you bleed and stun you, especially with the current system of lowered max health?

And how is the example of raising your skill by shooting rocks with a shotgun metaphorical or refers to something broader? If raising your skill was possible only by shooting zombies, how would that be different from what we have now? On the contrary, players would rarely waste bullets on a default setting to just raise a weapon skill, but you can see how lucrative that is with the common pool XP being as valuable as it is.

My point is that if some stupid LBD oversights didn't exist, those repeating, dull, grindy activities would not be possible or beneficial to the player. So the player would just play the game instead of trying to raise some skill in a boring annoying way. And there were still some points you could invest yourself wherever you wanted.

Common XP pool combined with gated perk recipes was the main reason a lot of people viewed A17 as a grind. I am not saying that it can't be salvaged - it can, like the LBD could. But they have to, imo, balance activity XP gain strictly by time spent. For example - zombies are always, infinitely, everywhere, readily available - they cost minimum time. Mining XP also shouldn't scale with block damage. And so on.

What do you do when you are a master user of one weapon but want to very your gameplay and try out some new methods? LBD - your screwed - you are not going to make up for the last 100 hours beating on ♥♥♥♥ with another weapon. Common pool xp - that play option is now open to you.
Click to expand...
Nothing stops you from trying out different weapons. You are only screwed if you want to be a master of the other weapon right away. You are free to use the other weapon as you see fit and master it in the process.

Whatever you may think about LBD, MM is flatly correct in stating that it is limiting.
Click to expand...
In some sense, your character not being able to shoot lazers out of their eyes is limiting too, but in a good way. What I am trying to say is that this kind of limitation, like the example of not being able to master a weapon without using it, is actually enjoyable to some people.

Most of the current complaints about the current leveling system are based around balance. The problem right now is not common pool - it is that zed farming is to efficient on the early game and mining is to efficient in the late game. That is why I actually prefer Rolland's method as players are freed up from ANY motivation around XP other than the core aspect - survival.
Click to expand...
Of course, I never said "this system is doomed beyond redemption, it sucks, bring LBD back". Was always discussing even before A17 was released, about having to balance xp sources, making rpg elements complimentary instead of "a goal" with actions having to depend on survival needs and said the exact thing you say about zombies and mining over 100 times. So I am looking forward to this too. Would be great if MM expressed the same sentiment, but from his recent posts I haven't seen any intention of him doing that. Edit: To clarify he did say that they will balance XP sources more in A18 but he also said this about the zombies, so I am not really sure what they are going to do.

PS: I like tRolands concept too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It severely limits player choice. Do anything fun get xp, buy what you want with that xp, not be locked into repetitive grindy actions that force you to do stupid things like get stabbed to improve your armor ability.
Click to expand...
You keep using that as an example, but the "armor" skill, which arguably should not have been a skill in the first place, could have been easily removed to resolve that flaw.

It would have taken far less work to fix what you had than to rip out LBD and replace it with the generic xp/perk system introduced in A17.

Now you are stuck with A17 and using the sunk cost fallacy to justify telling everyone to just enjoy the sour taste in their mouth because you do not want to go back and revisit the issue.

Sure you will always have sycophant fluffers out there who will uncritically lap up anything you put out, and tell you it is awesome.

But if you are setting the bar based on pleasing the lowest common denominator you are going to end up with a generic, uninspired game.

 
The survey suggests that a Hybrid system is what the majority of active players in this forum wants. The same active players that feel strongly enough about this game to discuss it with others.I am not a fan of LBD-only. Like I mentioned before in this pseudo-thread, I believe a Hybrid system is what we should be looking at and not going back and forth with weak arguments for LBD-only or Perks-only.

Also, like I said before, the way this thread is titled, and also the premise post that goes along with it, will only result in more people trying to either defend LBD or be against it... when neither of these should even be the focus here.

I would be careful with dismissing poll results, especially when they are started by moderators. Otherwise, you are saying the moment you post them, "Vote here for absolutely no reason whatsoever because it won't mean jack"
Click to expand...
530 respondents. A majority would be (530/2)+1, or 266. The most popular response got only 263 votes, and had nothing to do with LBD anyway.

 
530 respondents. A majority would be (530/2)+1, or 266. The most popular response got only 263 votes, and had nothing to do with LBD anyway.
Click to expand...
Either stop bitching about it, or go set up your own poll.

I will even help you do it.

 
530 respondents. A majority would be (530/2)+1, or 266. The most popular response got only 263 votes, and had nothing to do with LBD anyway.
Click to expand...
Yes it does, because it INCLUDES LBD

https://7daystodie.com/forums/showthread.php?97336-Perks-System-and-Level-Gates

32% like perks only

48% like hybrid

24% like LBD only

By going hybrid you get 48% approval, plus you are making the other categories at least partially approve. Let's say half of each would be disappointed but still ok with it. So add in 16% and 12%.

There should theoretically be somewhere around a 76% approval rating when going Hybrid.

.
Click to expand...
LBD only: 127 votes, HYBRID (which includes LBD): 255 <- by the way this number has gone up the past couple of days.

127 + 255 = 382

382 > 266

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Either stop bitching about it, or go set up your own poll.
I will even help you do it.
Click to expand...
I'm not bitching about it. You're using it claim something that the poll simply doesn't support. Plain and simple. Or was it someone else who only two posts ago said "telling everyone to just enjoy the sour taste" and "pleasing the lowest common denominator"?

Stop implying that your position is somehow some privileged vantage point. Not everyone (your words) dislikes the new perk system and those that do are hardly the "lowest common denominator" (again, your words).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes it does, because it INCLUDES LBD
Click to expand...
You cannot combine the votes for Hybrid and the votes for LBD only, without making an assumption that those voting for one would necessarily support the other (or, indeed, didn't skew the poll, deliberately or otherwise, by voting for both which the poll was perfectly happy to let them do).

The poll is basically useless, and making a new one with data determinant options would still be useless I suspect, because the response rate would be so low as to be statistically insignificant.

If there is any point in continuing to argue for LBD (and frankly, at this point, I doubt there is), it should be on the basis of what made LBD good, and what made TFP's prior implementation of it have some elements that weren't good and how they could have been fixed without dumping the entire system - and I do happen to think that the prior LBD was flawed but basically good, and could have been great if only the flaws had been addressed (such as needing to be hit to raise armor skill).

I just don't think that poll is worth anything by way of advancing any sort of LBD argument and moreover, I think it actually devalues any argument in favour of LBD when people cite that poll as evidence of its popularity.

 
You cannot combine the votes for Hybrid and the votes for LBD only, without making an assumption that those voting for one would necessarily support the other (or, indeed, didn't skew the poll, deliberately or otherwise, by voting for both which the poll was perfectly happy to let them do).
Click to expand...
I've assumed half of them would be ok with it. I think it's a fair assumption, being that I think that those who truly want LBD-only would be more than happy to see a compromise.

The poll is basically useless
Click to expand...
Yes, you've made it clear that they all are.

If there is any point in continuing to argue for LBD (and frankly, at this point, I doubt there is), it should be on the basis of what made LBD good, and what made TFP's prior implementation of it have some elements that weren't good and how they could have been fixed without dumping the entire system - and I do happen to think that the prior LBD was flawed but basically good, and could have been great if only the flaws had been addressed (such as needing to be hit to raise armor skill).
Click to expand...
Yes... yet again I will say that this should be the main focus here.

 
I've assumed half of them would be ok with it. I think it's a fair assumption, being that I think that those who truly want LBD-only would be more than happy to see a compromise.


Yes, you've made it clear that they all are.

Yes... yet again I will say that this should be the main focus here.
Click to expand...
I suspect that quite a few people may have voted for both Hybrid and LBD-only options knowing that doing so would effectively be doubling their voting power - the mere fact that was possible renders it hopelessly tainted.

I've read your posts regarding LBD in this thread, and I do largely agree with them, LBD could have been a great system if the flaws were fixed.

Anyway, I think that arguments done and dusted, so I doubt I'll bother posting much about why I think LBD was better, but being the pedant I am I reserve the right to interject when someone claims that poll supports something it doesn't... hehe.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top