Must be nice to have money to keep upgrading systems whenever a game ya like comes out that goes beyond your PC hardware limitations... or running it on downgraded graphics... remembering those good 'ol days..
Splinter Cell saga was one of the games of a many that was a deal breakers for me with the cost of upgrades... better shadowing texture, better stability, different effects, etc ..i bought 1 and was great. then next one came out and they improved apon it in the next story game.. then another came out... i must of dumped thousands either in upgraded parts or flat-out buying a new gaming system in the realm of $1,300 to $2000 ...
Or pay for the best console of $500 and have it till it fails on it's own or they come out with another one in a couple or few years or even a decade.
Each to their own i guess.
well, anyways - F1 offer no harm except to give owners more control over their game and actually Host and be an awesome admin.. now they're like every other player - "powerless" on their own purchased game from when they once had such power.![]()
I have patience and can play games long after they released, especially since most of the games I really like are indy games that could be played on a laptop, or turn-based RPGs. The only game I ever bought a PC for was 7d2d actually, and that PC cost me about $900
The console could cost $0 and it wouldn't make a difference if I want to play different games not available on it, like many of the indy games on steam. Splinter Cell, I don't care, never played it. But sure, my PC costs me a bit more than your console, but I can also do a lot more non-gaming stuff with that PC.
If I count that in, especially that I would need a PC anyway, and the only games-related additional expense is a graphics card for about $250 then an additional console for games would cost me more.
It is nice that a console works for you and is cheaper for you, that is why you have a console. For me a PC works and is actually cheaper than buying both, therefore I have a PC.