There is also a third group that say "this is exciting!" that you refuse to acknowledge. Evidence exists on the Streaming announcement page itself and in various conversations in different threads on the subject and in the replies of the streamer announcement videos. You are either turning a blind eye to that group or being disingenuous about it.
As I already said, I understand people like watching streams. And those who are excited probably don't actually understand what's going on or are blinded by the idea that something is exclusive. Like exclusivness would be a good thing, in this case.
If you tell people what's going on, you'll get these two groups. Maybe there are some who are happy for the streamer, that the streamer gets an exclusive deal, cuz certainly that's good for the streamer. So there's another group. Your group of people who like that they can't play does not exist. At least I never saw a single person with such an opinion and it does not makes sense either.
You can't please everyone. Not even "good" marketing does that. This will please enough to make it worth it.
Could you lay out how it is pleasing people? The only thing I can think of is the free keys. What else could be pleasing people? That streamers stream A17 three days before everybody can play? Is that, like, "great"?
This is the error in your logic, Kubikus.
It certainly is not.
You were never going to get it on a Friday.
A bad decision by the company does not mean my logic is faulty.
Nothing is being held back for three days.
Of course it is. The version the streamers use will be the same as the one the rest of us get on Monday. So it's obviously held back. It would even be held back if there was no stream event, but the version that exist on a Friday would not be released before Monday.
Even if we decided to cancel the stream event the experimental build would not be released until Monday.
But "would not" does not equal "could not" and instead of canceling the event you could also just move it to the next Monday and if you think that Friday is better, because people are having a free weekend, you confirm my argument that a Friday is the ideal release day. In any case it could be released on any day of the week and most certainly could it be released on the same day streamers get access.
So there really are only two choices for people:
A) Do nothing from Friday - Monday except continue to post speculation and whatnot and then get the build and start playing Monday.
B) Watch a streaming preview event from Friday - Monday and post about the things you see and then get the build and start playing Monday.
You keep trying to frame the situation as a choice between playing A17 or watching A17 and that was never the choice. The choice is between not watching or watching and if you are of the opinion that the not watching is the superior path then there is an easy solution for you to make that happen for yourself.
I know that the players don't have a choice. But the company does. And I'm not making it up that the company has that choice, you try to frame the situation like the company's decision was some kind of cosmic law that cannot be broken.
I've already hashed this out multiple times why we are doing this as an exclusive media preview. Go search my responses about this and why doing the event as an exclusive preview was done to attract streamers and have them sign on.
I mean, you are technically right. You can declare the whole thing an "exclusive media preview". But compared to other exclusive media previews, yours is a bit... Hey:
Adorable. :-D Because all you have is a buggy experimental of another alpha of an unfinished game. Like you could compare that with gameplay footage of the next DooM. There is also the fact that the version we get is the same, and that we get it, what?, 1 second after the event? If it was a couple weeks earlier, it would be a different story.
I've also explained elsewhere why the experimental will never be released on a Friday and always be released on a Monday. If you care enough you can go search that out as well.
I happened to find an explanation on the stream event page:
Q: If the game is good enough for streamers to show it, isn’t it good enough for players to play it?A: The version the streamers will be playing will be the same release candidate we plan for the whole community (who wish to test experimental) to get. But we have found that releasing an experimental version on a Monday is much better for us to be able to respond quickly and effectively with hotfixes and get new builds out to you that play better. The whole team isn’t always available on the weekend to address showstoppers but on that Monday we’ll be ready.
As I mentioned, you could avoid the players disgruntlement by giving the streamers access on a Monday as well. However, the argument for Mondays is not quite valid either. If a new alpha was released once a month: Alright. Employees should have their free weekend. But after a year, this argument ain't flyin. Tens of thousands of excited fans have to wait three more days, cuz Joel and the devs wanna go fishing?
But we both know you've already made up your mind about what the Truth is and which is why we have an impasse.
We have an impasse because you're either incapable or not allowed to see company decisions sceptical and realistically.
We just have to agree to disagree. From TFP's perspective not only is the event happening but it will most likely happen again with A18 (or whatever the next one will be called).
I agree that we disagree. And then..?
lol..This situation is like a kid who ran a lemonade stand last summer and was very successful. Now, as he plans to do it again this coming Summer another kid who hates the taste of lemonade tells him that it's a bad idea and it will never work. The kid that is planning his lemonade stand is going to go by his results rather than the advice of this other biased kid.
Actually, the situtation is like a company who ran a fairly clumsy marketing stunt last year, that already displeased a large number of people back then. But instead of improving it, the company makes the same mistakes again, and every time it is being brought up on a company forum, and be it in a subsentence, the chief moderator in charge unpacks his rhetorical toolbox in order to devalue the criticism with a fairly wide array of methods, that does, though, not include logic, reason and high quality techniques alike.
Ofc you both are one-sided.
I am in favor of a stream event, it's a good idea. That is why my perspective is not one sided at all. My approach is inclusive. As always, btw, just get over those brief flashes of self-approval that sometimes sparkle in my posts, and you'll see that I always argue for the greater good that is agreeable for everyone involved.
In this case, the only alteration to the organisation I suggest is to give everybody access, preferably on a Friday. The company still has 100 streamers streaming the game, the streamers still have keys to give away and can hype the event as some official stuff to attract people, and people can play and watch their favorite streamer.
That way, everybody could be happy. And there is no data availabe, thus neither proof, nor evidence, that this approach would negatively affect the company's profit.
Is... Any thread safe from #streamergate?
Kub, gotta ask homie... What do you hope to accomplish? Realistically?
Pimps determined this is a good idea as marketing strategy. Right, wrong, indifferent, it doesn't matter... Their pilot program last year was deemed a success, and they took feedback into account and decided to do it again this year, AND on a larger scale.
What's your goal, besides wearing out qwerty?
Serious question.
I'm trying to mod 1 block ingress back into the game. Isn't that obvious.