PC Alpha 20 Dev Diary

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thats because all of the angry ranting users treat the experimental branch as a stable finished product instead of what it actually is. Occasionally we’ve had folks say that TFP should just regularly update the latest_experimental as they develop so that people can witness all the designs steps and changes as they occur. That would be madness. Too many people just don’t have the patience and temperament for changes. 
 

There were so many changes like this one implemented and then reverted or fine tuned over the past year and a half that the QA team tested and dealt with that if some of you had experienced would have resulted in weekly forum blood moons. 
 

when a change happens the QA team does not rant based on the change log and what they suspect will be the result. They test and give evidence in data, screenshots, and video. They don’t immediately revert those changes and play it how they want. They experiment with it and report their results. 
 

I see a lot of hypotheticals based on worry and fear and not a lot of evidence to back up whether your base designs are actually no longer viable. I watched one video that was provided of Kage and it seemed like he coped just fine. 
 

Despite the assumption that TFP changes things due to complaints, I can assure you that they change things due to compelling evidential feedback. 
 

Interestingly, the evidential feedback being given presently is a very compelling argument to nerf bars to match the plates and pole HP. Red’s screenshots show a very clear picture and the several posts stating that bars can be placed back to back for 2x HP just like plates is a powerful  point that I’m sure the devs will consider if bars actually were an oversight. 
I'm not angry, just dissapointed, confused, and worried that it will ever be as good again. That's my honest initial reaction to this change, reporting otherwise would be dishonest of me. I can, and likely will, be charmed into accepting the "more realism" aspect, eventually, hopefully.

Again I am in the "prefers realism" camp, but I have much higher expectations of it. It's just super easy, almost impossible not, to fail. I cannot fathom how this new "shape/mass reflects HP and Structural Integrity" variable can be realistically implemented without entirely new super complex simulation level algorithms taking into account volume and mass distribution and how shapes of blocks effect each other. Talk about taxing your engine, jfc. But I also don't expect the devs to go that far... and THAT is the problem. There will inevitably be pieces that fail and shouldn't, and those that hold up and shouldn't. So now we have to learn nearly 1,400 shapes and their unique properties, when before they were just all the same and all was fine, build, go! Now it's a mess that may never recapture that feeling.

I can see how there are people that want this, and have wanted it before, my being one of them, but I am an actual realist, thus I do not think it is possible with the current engine, tools, and existing hardware. That's why I was happy with the existing compromise, this engine is already a step ahead from a voxel engine like Minecraft in it's implementation of Structural Integrity in the first place, even though it is only on a per block level... is THAT going to change. Is the structural analysis now going to take into account the geometry of each shape? No, would be nice but not going to happen on someone's desktop, this feels like a generic attempt to do that without actually doing it, and I am thus worried about the results.

But yeah, it is experimental, let's continue and see what happens, of course I will play either way, and have faith they'll end up somewhere fun/workable enough. But remaining silent on this would not be genuine of me as a player, and thus not helpful/informal to the devs, so this is my 2 cents.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But remaining silent on this would be ingenuine of me, so this is my 2 cents.
My response to you was not a censure about your temperament but just a literal answer to your musing about how things were happy and excited for a week and now gloomy and angry.

There are plenty of people who dislike the change but are taking it in stride and giving measured responses and they are appreciated. 
 

Im not asking anyone to remain silent. I’m letting people know that if what they really want is for TFP to change this, there is an effective way to give feedback that some are ignoring. 

 
I think, if this change continues to mutate(can't see how it won't tbh), the glaringly big problem, in the current iteration, is that -75% HP is not also -75% material cost.

I imagine that is an oversight/balance issue that will get dealt with in some way, hopefully soon, but until then I am not base building. Once that happens I can, and will, deal with reduced HP block builds. 

Is there even an argument that reduced HP blocks should still require the same material cost? Can't imagine there is, but I'm poking for a try.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just a shout out, is there something I am missing with regards my AK... takes 7.62mm ammo yet I can not load in AP 7.62mm ammo..

Screenshot_1.png

Also any way when placing blocks onto a slope the blocks placed can line up with the elevation ?

Screenshot_2.png

 
Just a shout out, is there something I am missing with regards my AK... takes 7.62mm ammo yet I can not load in AP 7.62mm ammo..

View attachment 22059

Also any way when placing blocks onto a slope the blocks placed can line up with the elevation ?

View attachment 22060


Hold r with the weapon equipped to change ammo type. Blocks are placed on top of the 1m square block below. If you place a block on a block that takes up less than a full 1m square the placed block will appear to float. That's just how the game is designed. Blocks cannot occupy  the space of another block.

 
I am sure people would appreciate you more if they could just see how you been during the farming debate and now the blocks debate

https://imgur.com/a/sLWDKc7  😁
lol..

wrong and stupid — Farming debate

slimy politician — Blocks debate

Well,  I WAS wrong about being able to achieve a large scale farm with LOTL 1 given that you wait to start with roughly 10 seeds. 

 
Hold r with the weapon equipped to change ammo type. Blocks are placed on top of the 1m square block below. If you place a block on a block that takes up less than a full 1m square the placed block will appear to float. That's just how the game is designed. Blocks cannot occupy  the space of another block.


Problem I have the AK gun will not equip the ammo type. :(

 
All this rage over building blocks reminded me of the sheer R A G E people spewed out in A19 when the loot was changed to where you wouldn't find steel tools week one. So many wall of text rants about how they would never play again and how it made it pointless to do PoI before X week because all the loot containers  would have lower tier loot so they had to wait until gamestage X to get anything good, and how it made no sense that a sealed wooden box had a stone axe in it etc etc etc etc
And I know people who stopped playing because of that.

 
A quick fix might be to just multiply upgrade costs by the HP multiplier.  Thus at least upgrading those blocks would quickly reflect their lowered HP.  It wouldn't help those that build directly to shapes (ex Steel Shapes) though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Off topic, but regarding trying to generate a new Random Gen World in A20, I have yet to get a world to generate or load up. Start a new world, tried to generate a Random Gen World, and after I hit Generate World, it starts but after about 3 minutes it stops, console pops down and says "EXC Nullreferenceexception Object reference not set to an instant of an object" and that's that. Everything stops, I have to close the game and been trying since last night. I can only get a new world if I load up one of the PreGen maps we have for A20 to choose from, or Navezgane. How do I fix this? I've deleted save game files, all my old worlds from A19 but still keeps happening. Deleted the mods folder entirely so it wouldn't be a problem. What am I missing? Any ideas or help would be GREATLY appreciated.

 
Off topic, but regarding trying to generate a new Random Gen World in A20, I have yet to get a world to generate or load up. Start a new world, tried to generate a Random Gen World, and after I hit Generate World, it starts but after about 3 minutes it stops, console pops down and says "EXC Nullreferenceexception Object reference not set to an instant of an object" and that's that. Everything stops, I have to close the game and been trying since last night. I can only get a new world if I load up one of the PreGen maps we have for A20 to choose from, or Navezgane. How do I fix this? I've deleted save game files, all my old worlds from A19 but still keeps happening. Deleted the mods folder entirely so it wouldn't be a problem. What am I missing? Any ideas or help would be GREATLY appreciated.
Did you ever do a direct intall of prefabs? (ie, into the Data\Prefabs\ folder instead of a modlet package) I only ask because I inadvertently left some old Compo pak stuff in there when I first updated to A20 and ran into the same problem. 

 
Oh @%$#, I may have actually... I had the Compo Pak in my A19 game worlds. I thought I deleted all of that crap... Lemme check

 
Wow - video too, thanks for the demo !

What the hell am I doing then, I look into it prob something stupid my end.

Thanks again.
i can definitely see why you might have been confused on that i don't think there's a description on bullets to hold r to load different ammunitions in which that would be a really good idea for newer players so they can click on the description of bullets and let it say this 7.62 ammo all the other stuff then underneath it say hold r to load different ammo types into the respective weapon 

just saying i think its a good idea

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top