I agree on early weapons being too powerful & I think a way to do it is add it to the Perk System so it is not a beginning Ammo or reason I called it a buff. The damage also could increase as the player increases his or her skills, maybe we could Forge Chain Links for Ammo to Entangle the Zeds Limbs. Glass & Lead Weights are found early game & should be a good source for Ammo in the Blunderbuss, just limit the Damage until you increase your Skills or read a Book. I just feel the Blunderbuss is a very versatile weapon meant to hold different types of Ammo or Shot. I think I was a Pirate in a former life, ArrrggghhhPossibly, those are easy to do, but I'm not sure how powerful starter weapons should be.
The style of blunderbuss used in the game is _literally_ a hand-cannon. Any style of ammunition you can use in a cannon can be used in a blunderbuss... with varying degrees of effectiveness.I just feel the Blunderbuss is a very versatile weapon meant to hold different types of Ammo or Shot. I think I was a Pirate in a former life, Arrrggghhh
maybe colored reticle/crosshairs finally?Pretty much this, we need a high end crossbow model yet.
I didn't feel I needed to do a book report on the history of a Blunderbuss to ask for more Ammo, that's why I asked to forge Chain Links, for Grape-Shot, ArrrggghhhhhThe style of blunderbuss used in the game is _literally_ a hand-cannon. Any style of ammunition you can use in a cannon can be used in a blunderbuss... with varying degrees of effectiveness.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cannon_projectiles
Different ammunition types would make the blunderbuss a Swiss-army knife* of a gun. Need to clear a lot of zombies? Grape-shot. Need to kill a really hard zombie? Solid-shot to the head. Need to burn everything in a room? Carcass-shot.
* Not to be confused with the Swiss-army sword which, although useful, suffered from an overly large handle.
We may have to prod some modders to get varied ammunition for blunderbusses but i'd love to see it in vanilla.
How have you felt about gas barrels? They are far more of a space saving measure than this would be. Each barrel makes over a half block of gas (600) and can stack to 500. That is 300K PER STACK. You can fit over 13 million gas in your inventory alone and this certainly has more of an impact than stone - a resource that you never need to take anywhere.Uh... i don't know how I feel about that.
*wakes up with a start*Can you carry 1200 stones?
Its only for ores, and only AFTER you find that one book.i think the stacking in pallets should be for raw resources only and not for used everything else to circumvent normal inventory limits.![]()
There should be a new achievement for one hundred pallets crafted for every resource that can be crafted into a pallet....Its only for ores, and only AFTER you find that one book.
Wait. You need a book to know how to throw sacks in a pile?Its only for ores, and only AFTER you find that one book.
Occlusion culling is in a prototype state. It works, but needs a lot more refinement. Don't know what version it would be released in.What about occlusion culling? And can we expect these optimisations next update?Thanks for the hard work!
Man, I need to get my children to read that book because no matter how many times I tell them they still haven't perked into it...Wait. You need a book to know how to throw sacks in a pile?
As the ALS challenge proved, you can't ask people to dump a bucket of ice water over their head without someone taking it as an opportunity to get themselves a Darwin awardWait. You need a book to know how to throw sacks in a pile?
Was that a direct quote? Pretty sure stupider is not correct, wouldn't it be "more stupid"? If so, shame on you George Carlin lol...As the ALS challenge proved, you can't ask people to dump a bucket of ice water over their head without someone taking it as an opportunity to get themselves a Darwin award
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”
― George Carlin
Stop trying to prove which half you're in.Was that a direct quote? Pretty sure stupider is not correct, wouldn't it be "more stupid"? If so, shame on you George Carlin lol...