wow…I guess he did say those words…
Please stop. You can't even understand the implication of what YOU said, I was not talking about the exact words, but the point is you'd rather run "guns blazing" through AAZs than having the option to stealth through them. Admit it. If you really like playing stealth through and through, you'd WANT AAZs to be changed, but you don't.
You're CLEARLY trolling. Good troll, go back under your bridge.
I'm not talking about the abuse specifically on the player, but more of an abuse over the player choice of a stealth focused build.
Sorry, but this is false. If by "respond" you mean running away and coming back sneaking, that's a "false" solution IMO.
generally speaking it depends. fps is frames per second or how many "images" the game renders per second. The higher the fps the smoother and more responsive the game feels. However not all games need a high fps to be considered "smooth" rts game could be run comfortably at 30 fps for example. It also depends on what monitor you have and if you're running at it's higher refresh rates. You can still notice greater response times at framerates above your monitors refresh rate, you won't be seeing the extra frames but the frames that are displayed will have a lower latency because of the higher fps.
Haha yawn no where in any of my posts have i mentioned running and gunning. Coming across pretty desperate to force your way on others.. twisting words. Changing words to push your agenda.. yawn
Wait I forgot you are not getting your way so you use the word troll.
argh yes still not getting your way so in comes the names.. Yawn... boring a 2 yr old can give better insults 
You’ll need to do better at showing how using a classic stealth tactic used in many games is “false”. Just calling it false is not good enough.
Well, as I said, the main difference is that in 7D2D you're always going to fail a stealth check in AAZs.
Again, nobody is asking to remove AAZs, I'm just asking for them to be integrated with the same stealth mechanics that is already used in the rest of the game.
hwell: 
yeah honestly i surrfer a lot because of that
Yeah so this "fanatic" about 60 is annoying me - honestly i played even 24 some games and it was good enough. well i honestly hate modern fps like warzone fortinte because the streamers yt etc but i hope devs will more and more be focues about looks - you know bigger maps , better textures more enemies on screen that 60 fps . 30 was honestly good enough
Well i'm think graphic is more important that frames and i hate when streamers play on warzone etc and have 100 fps but graphic looks terrible. why ? because people watch them so devs will be more focused about at least 60 fps that good graphic. well i played a lot in mw 2 , dod and it was good. now playing in modern pvp is nightmaregenerally speaking it depends. fps is frames per second or how many "images" the game renders per second. The higher the fps the smoother and more responsive the game feels. However not all games need a high fps to be considered "smooth" rts game could be run comfortably at 30 fps for example. It also depends on what monitor you have and if you're running at it's higher refresh rates. You can still notice greater response times at framerates above your monitors refresh rate, you won't be seeing the extra frames but the frames that are displayed will have a lower latency because of the higher fps.
That will cause screen tearing however that is another topic, so it's generally best to not run games at a framerate your monitor can't display (except for benchmarking purposes). As a rule of thumb 60fps is a good starting point for the majority of games, over 60 will have a greater importance in games that are fast paced. 7DTD kind of sits in the middle, it has a mix of slow paced gameplay and fast paced gameplay. If you have a monitor that can display more than 60 go for it, it will feel much more responsive especially if you're sensitive to that kind of thing and if you already have a monitor that can do so you may as well make use of it, since presumably you paid a premium for a higher refresh rate display. If you have a 60hz panel that's perfectly fine too, you won't be missing all that much (in 7DTD at least)
The last thing with higher fps gameplay is that you will need not only a more powerful GPU but CPU too, especially for 7DTD since the pc will have to work harder to render the extra frames. With higher settings (but not completely maxed) 100fps should be achievable for most people. If you have a decent setup 150fps should be possible. However when talking about frame rate, context is important, the estimates above are based on the assumption you're using a higher resolution panel than 1440p. If you're running at 1080p you can get away with a much less powerful GPU. The FPS numbers also assume you're using highish settings. You can of course sett everything to the lowest it can go and stare at the sky with 500 fps, but i'm assuming people that want to go higher than 60 want to do so without making the game look like a$$ and the ability to look at the ground occasionally
Well, as I said, the main difference is that in 7D2D you're always going to fail a stealth check in AAZs.
I thought it was evident I was speaking about that.
Again, nobody is asking to remove AAZs, I'm just asking for them to be integrated with the same stealth mechanics that is already used in the rest of the game.
Will this ruin the game for other players? No. They can still go through AAZs the same way as today.
Will stealth players be able to automatically skip AAZs? No. There will always be a good chance you still wake up the sleepers.
So, I don't understand what your objection really is. The answer is in the details of my explanation, but both you and stallionsden just see the general argument, which you don't agree with, and then reply ignoring the important details I pointed out. Now, I can forget about that troll/clown, because he's evidently just trying to win the argument, but frankly I was expecting much more from you.
honestly you both : i think there is quiet good solution of this problem - add "careful" type of zombie - he just "stay" on wall and ceiling . he start scream when he saw you so it can work like AAZ but with "real reason " why zombie is alerted. So in dunno 3 tier of perk you have 10 sec before they scream and alert the rest of zombie. maybe this ins not perfect idea but compromise bettwen no AAZ and AAZ
You could have avoided poisoning if you took a green pill before meals) (I'm not sure if this was intended, but it always worked with me)
Yeah resist disease covered food poisoning. Also covers dysentery, for those times you want to eat 50 sham sandwiches and wash it down with toilet water
Depends on the game, high fps also has a competitive advantage since your eye balls see more recent frames. So in a situation where 2 players come to a corner and both come into view of each other at the same time, the player with the higher framerate will see a couple of frames showing the other player first. It's not always a situation like that tho it was just an example, even in that situation a couple frames is literally the blink of an eye. So if your reaction time is slow if doesn't really do anything for you. But that is why games like warzone see players running higher frame rates, pretty much all competitive games are designed to be easy to run at high frame rates.
But this didn’t work with other pills, so your example doesn’t quite fit )Yeah resist disease covered food poisoning. Also covers dysentery, for those times you want to eat 50 sham sandwiches and wash it down with toilet water
The green pills are vitamins, which is what you were talking about. Just saying they also prevent dysentery.
Sure! I’m all for the myriad compromise ideas.
