But whether things are good depends on a persons tastes. THERE ARE people perfectly enjoying A17 as is.
But there is no unanimous opinion - that A17 is good.
where is your tolerance? 
) based on what he really sees. In contrast to those people who believe, for example, advertising and television...do you know them?
There never was unanimous opinion about 7d2d, you can find posts at the time of A16 experimental critizising each and every change from A15, complaining about the bugs, the balance, that A16 is totally broken,... So, why those numerous discussions about A16? And A15? And A14? Because every change has at least one person who liked the old way protesting that something was taken away from him.But there is no unanimous opinion - that A17 is good.Otherwise, why all these numerous discussions ?
Who's right? most likely, the A17 is not successful, and those people who are happy are wrong to the same extent as those who are not happy - the only question is that some are satisfied - but that doesn't make them automatically right.
There are people who say that it "is not good", where you take them with your logic? to the wrong?
...
I emphasize: I mean that MM constantly says that everything is good, and trying to justify himself...
...
The fixes they have put in so far were things complained about. They do get what is alienating people from A17 and those things they are willing to adjust they are doing. More changes are coming.
Guns are still craftable via parts. They are just different parts. You also still get to use the assembly screen for adding new parts that do a lot more than the old parts. If you want it to be like before then simply don’t shoot your gun until ALL mod slots are filled and it will be just like A16.
What you don’t get is the nature of developing and experimenting. This is the first project of The Fun Pimps and they are using its development to experiment with different systems which they may or may not use in future projects. The Fun Pimps are actually using early access to give us a glimpse into their actual development of ideas. They have a roadmap of wanting the player’s character to progress and grow more capable even as the world also grows more dangerous. That roadmap has never altered. But they are interested in experimenting with different systems of attaining their design goal. You fell in love with one of the experiments they chose not to use. This doesn’t make them liars nor does it make them directionless. Characters still progress in the game in a way that is enjoyable for many players.
Simple. It is because leveling quickly is their primary objective. If your primary objective is to build a bicycle then you will engage in all sorts of activities in order to get the bike constructed. Things like hitting surface boulders for iron and gathering bones and cloth to make duct tape will feel meaningful because they lead to your objective. But if your primary objective is to level up quickly, then any activity which is not the best source of xp is seen as worthless. You see them post such statements all the time and when they say things like in “A17.0 we were forced to kill zombies but in A17.1 we are forced to mine” it’s because the perceived xp gain top provider has shifted.
While I don't always like the way that TFP change things upon release of a new Alpha I am always won over by how the game is changed to fix the problems that arise from the changes while still keeping the changes in the game. This effectively means that with each new
It is a function of the resources you get per swing. So as far as cars goes, if you get an Engine your XP total for the whole car will be a lot more than if you don't. When mining etc, if you take perks that increase your mined resource count, your XP for mining goes up.
My post was about how that's not actually true. While there is a general upward trend, I've noticed that once I got modded steel tools and 5/5 Miner and Mother Lode, my XP and iron per boulder was actually significantly less than it was with an unmodded iron pick and fewer perks. It went down even further if I mined with power attacks vs. normal attacks. Resource income from mining is not terribly consistent throughout progression and that means the XP gain isn't either.
Nope. The point of the gun parts was once your gun was assembled, all subsequent parts that you found that were higher level gave small, incremental improvements which was very satisfying progression that lasted till the weapon was level 600. There is nothing comparable in A17. In A17 you will have enough mods to fill every slot the moment you can build any particular gun, and there is nowhere to go to improve your guns after tier 6, which is ~level 100 or day 30.
Go into house, activate spawns, go outside.
As a fully upgraded miner, I am also a fully upgraded (melee) soldier. :cocksure: I can do what you describe very easily (one-shotting if my head-shots are landing). I've tried full days of both activities. There's no comparison.
