A New Chapter for The Fun Pimps and 7 Days to Die

faatal said:
Me too. New content is fun to get. The chicken coop is mostly done. I got my part working on Monday, where AI hears the chicken you are carrying.
Click to expand...
Just to remind you that, of all the new animal models that were shown 2 years ago, the only one still not in game is the pig, which I find strange that they (whoever works on those) had time to do all of them, except one. it's not a big deal, it's just a new pig, but 2 years is a really long time to leave just that one model on the backburner.
Could it be that, because the pic is a completely new model, and not one replacing another, it could have a lot more work needed for it to be completed?

If possible, can you ask around so we get an answer and we can finally shut up about it (well, mostly me). 😁

Thank you @faatal
 
Space4Ace said:
Just to remind you that, of all the new animal models that were shown 2 years ago, the only one still not in game is the pig, which I find strange that they (whoever works on those) had time to do all of them, except one. it's not a big deal, it's just a new pig, but 2 years is a really long time to leave just that one model on the backburner.
Could it be that, because the pic is a completely new model, and not one replacing another, it could have a lot more work needed for it to be completed?

If possible, can you ask around so we get an answer and we can finally shut up about it (well, mostly me). 😁

Thank you @faatal
Click to expand...
A new entity is much more work than a model replacement.

The shark wins though. That model has been in the game since before my 8 years here. I have dreamed of adding it as a fun Friday task. I would like to see water biomes and fish someday.
 
HammerDano said:
didn't you read the rest?

do you let people take cheap shots for free?
Click to expand...
Dano there isn't soul on this forum who actually takes in anything you say because of how you say it.

Saying "You sure you want the smoke" is unbelievable cringe and is incredibly indicative of just how out of touch with reality you are. There is no smoke on an internet forum about a survival game. You consistently say a bunch of poorly worded vitriol. That is not smoke. You are not feared. You are laughed at.
 
HammerDano said:
good grief...
you sure you want the smoke?
you have not even answered anything I asked from your last ■■■■ post.
Click to expand...
Why would I bother answering you? Anytime anyone answers you, you just ignore it and keep ranting. What smoke are you talking about, exactly? The bit coming out of your ears?
HammerDano said:
these guys sold the company and are pretending they "joined" interactive...that they still have control over the game.
Click to expand...
I mean, being bought by a company means you join them. Your tinfoil hat must be on a little too tight today.
HammerDano said:
if ■■■■ing me around is what you need to do to cope with this...have at it. I don't take you seriously.
Click to expand...
I do enjoy riling you up, though I am starting to feel sorry for you as I do think there must be something wrong with you for you to still be acting this way.
HammerDano said:
have TFP released any updates that fix how much MORE poorly it runs on console since 2.5?

you seem to want to pretend there are no legitimate complaints.
Click to expand...
You realize 2.6 is in EXP, right? Us PC players gotta test the updates so you poor console peasants get a better update. You're welcome. :)
 
IzPrebuilt said:
Dano there isn't soul on this forum who actually takes in anything you say because of how you say it.

Saying "You sure you want the smoke" is unbelievable cringe and is incredibly indicative of just how out of touch with reality you are. There is no smoke on an internet forum about a survival game. You consistently say a bunch of poorly worded vitriol. That is not smoke. You are not feared. You are laughed at.
Click to expand...
I get it...you're still butthurt about me saying TFP sure got their money's worth out of sponsoring ONE of your videos.

I think You say whatever you think will get you applause from the people you are in front of...right now it's the forum. It's not like they watch your content.
 
bdubyah said:
Why would I bother answering you? Anytime anyone answers you, you just ignore it and keep ranting. What smoke are you talking about, exactly? The bit coming out of your ears?

I mean, being bought by a company means you join them. Your tinfoil hat must be on a little too tight today.

I do enjoy riling you up, though I am starting to feel sorry for you as I do think there must be something wrong with you for you to still be acting this way.

You realize 2.6 is in EXP, right? Us PC players gotta test the updates so you poor console peasants get a better update. You're welcome. :)
Click to expand...
sure bud...tell yourself whatever you need to hear.

any chance they've just been doing bug fixes for three months, because the brothers were busy negotiating the sale of the company, so everything else got put on hold?

it's been 3 months since 2.5 ■■■■ed up how the game plays on console...don't give a ■■■■ about that do ya?
 
HammerDano said:
sure bud...tell yourself whatever you need to hear.

any chance they've just been doing bug fixes for three months, because the brothers were busy negotiating the sale of the company, so everything else got put on hold?
Click to expand...
I mean, 2.6 went into EXP a month ago, so I'd imagine they were working on that. Is that really so hard for your smooth brain to comprehend?
HammerDano said:
it's been 3 months since 2.5 ■■■■ed up how the game plays on console...don't give a ■■■■ about that do ya?
Click to expand...
I mean...no? Why would I choose to play the game on an inferior system? How exactly did 2.5 ■■■■ up consoles specifically? Does the game just not launch at the moment for you? They mostly fixed the camera issue that came with third person, and there is some known city performance issues from what I've seen which were addressed in the latest 2.6 build so they are obviously working on things. But if you acknowledged that then you'd have one less thing to ■■■■■ about, and we can't have that, can we?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top