But if you use your brains, you make yourself a target for the zombies who want to eat your brains.
That's still happening? Ugh. I thought that would have been fixed in 2.6. Definitely needs to be fixed before 3.0. It's a pretty serious bug.
Sage?
I hope you've realized how exciting RWG is.
Looking at other job postings that does not appear to be a one off. The job posting for design director is looking for someone with experience on a “successful live multiplayer game.”
What older version of the game are you on?
thank you for noting that.
Was that issue fixed? I know it was a problem in 2.5 and nothing I saw of the 2.6 notes said it was fixed, unless I missed it. Pretty sure I've seen it on my server in 2.6.
It's normal. I see the zombies go to the easier (dead) animal instead of the person who's got these big guns and melee weapons... Makes sense.@faatal : just recently I noticed what could be considered "weird behavior" on the part of the AI.
Is it normal that a wight passes right beside me and runs to an animal corpse to eat it instead of attacking me?
Yeah, I know, but in this case the dead animal was behind me (far away) and the wight was coming from the opposite side.
I've been playing 2.6 for hundreds of hours. I haven't had it happen once.
Yeah, that's normal and intended. The original dev stream showing off the behavior commented on it. Not every zombie will target that first, though. Some will still ignore it to attack you. I think it may be related to what they "see" first. The corpse can have a larger range than your character to be noticed, so depending where the zombie was and where the corpse is compared to you, they may attack you first or go to the corpse first. But that's speculation on my part. I've never really paid attention and just accepted that some attack and some eat. But they did talk about it back then.@faatal : just recently I noticed what could be considered "weird behavior" on the part of the AI.
Is it normal that a wight passes right beside me and runs to an animal corpse to eat it instead of attacking me?
Are we still talking zombies or did we switch to forum members?
From the first days of self check out at a store I have refused them. Over 25 years now. Won't use them and if I'm in a store that REQUIRES me to use one I leave all my intended purchases at the counter and walk out. Still today, Places like Wal-Mart grocery and Lowes try to do it. I often shop at both places and find ALL "cashier manned check-out" lanes closed except the self checkout lanes- sometimes they have a single support rep in the vicinity to give the appearance of a cashier but make no mistake, for every closed register, that's 1 less cashier employed per shift. I will never, knowingly trade hundreds of cashier and customer support jobs for a single remote IT contract to support the register with occasional on-call responses from a one or two technicians. So, for me, a quarter century of refusing to allow the "tech" flavor of the month to remove jobs. Call me naiveté, call me whatever you want but not a single person has lost their job because of me making a decision to use forced automation no matter how hard the big box stores have tried to push their mechanical barbarians. Using AI for anecdotal self help is one thing, utilizing AI to destroy the livelihood of 2 maybe the next 3 generations of outlook is akin to subjugation. In this country alone you have over 300000000 people and you are telling me everyone is just OK with the notion that 60% of the 50% that are working will be unemployed in the foreseeable future? ...there's gonna be some insane poverty levels across all regions- so mabye next time you think twice about adopting use of the self checkout
