Margin for error.You want 100% GPU usage while playing games. Why have a GPU for gaming if it isn't being used to its full potential!
Right but 100% GPU usage shown in the task manager doesn't mean that the card is operating at its maximum capacity. Certain benchmarks utilize the GPU much more, i.e. FurMark.Margin for error.
Never operate a machine at its maximum capacity.
I'd rather not be able to fry an egg on my gfx card.
I'm failing to see the relevance here. I'd hate to run any hardware above 80% capacity for any length of time. If the operating system says it's running at 100% capacity that's too much regardless of any benchmarking score unless you're running the benchmark test for the same length of time as your average gaming session. Sure, push the hardware to the limit if you want but you can be damn sure you'll be replacing that hardware far more often than you should be.Right but 100% GPU usage shown in the task manager doesn't mean that the card is operating at its maximum capacity. Certain benchmarks utilize the GPU much more, i.e. FurMark.
Did you run out of Vram? Without knowing your full system specs, I wouldn't really know exactly what's being bottleneck'd. But sudden fps drops like that (with no visual reason to drop) usually means a bottleneck somewhere.It´s lately happening random tough. Well known terrain on my map i have driven trough many times already, usually having like 80-90% GPU usage, suddenly start to lag badly, fully utilizing the GPU out of nowhere. Like 10FPS instead of 60. No planted trees or selfbuilt stuff in that area. Logging out and back in got me back to normal on the exact same spot.
Ideally, you'd want to see CPU, GPU and Ram all use 100% to really feel like you have the perfect balance in hardware, but we all know that would never happen as every game is different, and most games only benefit from 2 cores anyways which is the biggest bottleneck in terms of fps.You want 100% GPU usage while playing games. Why have a GPU for gaming if it isn't being used to its full potential!
Hardware never overheats if properly vented and not excessively overclocked. If your hardware is capable of overheating, then your setup sucks, simple as that. Heat issues are easily solved but usually ignored by both the case manufacturers and the customers who buy them.Margin for error.
Never operate a machine at its maximum capacity.
I'd rather not be able to fry an egg on my gfx card.
Wrong. There are hundreds of thousands of ppl out there stressing their hardware out to 100% 24/7... it's called crypto mining. And when properly set up for adequate cooling, can last years non-stop without issue. Also, as a tech person with over 15 years experience, I've never heard of hardware failing just because it was being stressed out to 100% too much or w/e. The only time computer hardware fails is due to product defect / poor quality parts or inadequate cooling.I'm failing to see the relevance here. I'd hate to run any hardware above 80% capacity for any length of time. If the operating system says it's running at 100% capacity that's too much regardless of any benchmarking score unless you're running the benchmark test for the same length of time as your average gaming session. Sure, push the hardware to the limit if you want but you can be damn sure you'll be replacing that hardware far more often than you should be.
I have a raspi with significant carbon scoring that would disagree with you. Fully heatsinked and vented but pushed too hard, not overclocked at all.Hardware never overheats if properly vented and not excessively overclocked. If your hardware is capable of overheating, then your setup sucks, simple as that. Heat issues are easily solved but usually ignored by both the case manufacturers and the customers who buy them.
lol, it's a raspi... I seriously doubt it has a proper heatsink and fan that actually pushes air on it. Anything that pushes less than 3 CFM is basically pointless. If it does in fact have proper heatsink and fan and still overheats, then that's just a badly designed raspi, which isn't far fetched since if I remember correctly, those are designed by very small indie companies / ppl in their garage and not large corporations who spend millions in research and development.I have a raspi with significant carbon scoring that would disagree with you. Fully heatsinked and vented but pushed too hard, not overclocked at all.![]()
To be fair, it had been running constantly for half-a-decade at least.lol, it's a raspi... I seriously doubt it has a proper heatsink and fan that actually pushes air on it. Anything that pushes less than 3 CFM is basically pointless. If it does in fact have proper heatsink and fan and still overheats, then that's just a badly designed raspi, which isn't far fetched since if I remember correctly, those are designed by very small indie companies / ppl in their garage and not large corporations who spend millions in research and development.
Argument doesn't work with any electric rotating saw blade, like Skilsaw or Table Saw. Also doesn't work with water pumps, light bulbs, air compressors, belt sanders, chainsaws, etc. All the things I mentioned are specifically designed to be run at 100% or else you risk damaging them or render them useless. So clearly not all machinery.To be fair, it had been running constantly for half-a-decade at least.
The basic principle stands for all machinery though, whether electrical or mechanical. Any machine run at 80% capacity will last longer than a machine run at 100% capacity which will, in turn, last longer than a machine run at 120% capacity.
Oh, I hate hearing about Windows 10 updates... you just never know what kind of damage those stupid updates will do next. That said though, I'd definitely never set the viewing range to max just because, unless you're flying, there's really no benefit to it anyways... and the hardware requirements for max viewing range is so intense... it's just not worth it.Running a R5 3600 with 16GB RAM 3200Mhz (yes i set the XMP Profile) and a GTX1070. This just happened during the last week a few times. Didn´t change anything, besides the WIN10 Update. Before that this only happened when flying with viewing range set to max, turning it down helped there. First i thought it was the cheap server we rented but then it happened in SP. Actually would be odd if you need more than 8GB of VRAM. Well time to let Afterburner running while playing tough.
Yup, i run a dedicated server from an i5 4460 and 16GB RAMOh, I hate hearing about Windows 10 updates... you just never know what kind of damage those stupid updates will do next. That said though, I'd definitely never set the viewing range to max just because, unless you're flying, there's really no benefit to it anyways... and the hardware requirements for max viewing range is so intense... it's just not worth it.
I myself have an R5 1600x, 16GB 2933MHz ram, GTX1060 (heavily overclocked)... and I've never experienced this issue at all.
Also, why rent a server when you can just create your own using scrap computer parts you probably have lying around? You'd be surprised by how little it takes to run a server for this game. A modern CPU with 16+GB of ram if hosting for a lot of players, a basic ssd, decent internet (40Mbit or better)... done. No GPU needed. I myself have hosted a few games with the family and friends on an old FX8320 CPU (OC'd of course) with only 8GB of ram (currently at 12GB now) and it always ran silky smooth with no signs of stress.
And don't forget, Linux is both free, and has better performance than Windows.Yup, i run a dedicated server from an i5 4460 and 16GB RAMOh, I hate hearing about Windows 10 updates... you just never know what kind of damage those stupid updates will do next. That said though, I'd definitely never set the viewing range to max just because, unless you're flying, there's really no benefit to it anyways... and the hardware requirements for max viewing range is so intense... it's just not worth it.
I myself have an R5 1600x, 16GB 2933MHz ram, GTX1060 (heavily overclocked)... and I've never experienced this issue at all.
Also, why rent a server when you can just create your own using scrap computer parts you probably have lying around? You'd be surprised by how little it takes to run a server for this game. A modern CPU with 16+GB of ram if hosting for a lot of players, a basic ssd, decent internet (40Mbit or better)... done. No GPU needed. I myself have hosted a few games with the family and friends on an old FX8320 CPU (OC'd of course) with only 8GB of ram (currently at 12GB now) and it always ran silky smooth with no signs of stress.
Ya, I really want to give Linux a try... but finding the motivation to getting it installed and learning this new OS.... that takes a lot of effort for me as I'm not a big fan of change. Besides, 7d2d isn't the only game I host, and I imagine there might be a small chance I can't get an indie game hosted on a Linux server. Is the tiny bit of performance gain really worth it, especially when I don't feel like I need it?And don't forget, Linux is both free, and has better performance than Windows.