PC Who is Kuosimodo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fox said:
Kuosimodo is nothing more than a coward. He/she judges everyone while staying in the shadows because he/she can't handle being judged. I have zero respect for ppl like that. If I ever find out what this person's primary account is... you can be sure I'll judge every single one of his/her posts the same way mine got judged.
Click to expand...


Not everyone is comfortable voicing their opinions on topics, kuosimodo may just be comfortable using emojis to express their thoughts on the post.

You are also assuming that they have a 2nd account, but no information out there confirms that this is the case.  Sure n2n1 stated that they know who kuosimodo is, but that is hardly confirmation that this is an user with a second account.

If you don't like their reactions, just simply ignore it.  As for the coward comment, why do you need to know who they are?  Do you want to fight them behind school at 3 pm to teach them a lesson on posting negative reactions to your posts?  JUST IGNORE IT.  If you think they are in the wrong, take the high road.  Just ignore their reactions.  Trying to track down who kuosimodo is just to harshly judge their posts to get back at them seems petty to me.

 
BFT2020 said:
Not everyone is comfortable voicing their opinions on topics, kuosimodo may just be comfortable using emojis to express their thoughts on the post.

You are also assuming that they have a 2nd account, but no information out there confirms that this is the case.  Sure n2n1 stated that they know who kuosimodo is, but that is hardly confirmation that this is an user with a second account.

If you don't like their reactions, just simply ignore it.  As for the coward comment, why do you need to know who they are?  Do you want to fight them behind school at 3 pm to teach them a lesson on posting negative reactions to your posts?  JUST IGNORE IT.  If you think they are in the wrong, take the high road.  Just ignore their reactions.  Trying to track down who kuosimodo is just to harshly judge their posts to get back at them seems petty to me.
Click to expand...
I agree about reaction but "track down who he is" is just a play for me. In Poland we have newsspaper about games called CD - Action. And for years people were trying to figured out who Smuggler is because it was 100% he is one of them team. So if Kuosimodo is rly second account of one of 7DTD devs it will be even cooler and add more "forum legends" like snowdog and pervered things

 
I just want to mention that there are no emojis that give negative reputation. All emojis of a negative nature are neutral when it comes to forum reputation. All positive reactions give a +1 to your rep. So people really can just ignore dislikes and such since they don't downgrade you in the least.  

 
Crater Creator said:
Sure, a user's IP is logged. It's logged on every... post.  :doh:

(not to mention how IP address isn't as uniquely identifying as it once was).
Click to expand...


No one said anything about every single post logging the IP. Obviously, as that account doesn´t have any posts. As far as i can tell my IP didn´t change for a while now. Not that i check that regulary though.

What is logged (or was logged back then, it has been a while since i was mod/admin) in many forums is the IP when the users register, not necessarily visible for the mods, but with the option to check for multiple accounts. Now that isn´t a 100% reliable method, but it helped at least to sort out some spam/troll accounts and bots, at least those from lazy people.

Not sure about the MAC-Adress but i guess there could be a software solution to read it out?

@Fox Ever thought about that he might be able to understand english good enough to have an opinion on posts, but doesn´t wanna post himself because he maybe even uses google translator to read here? Or simply doesn´t wanna get blamed for his maybe bad english?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Roland said:
If there is ever a 7 Days to Die convention and they show up, I hope they never say a word the whole weekend but simply give a thumb up or thumb down to each person they pass. 
Click to expand...
Do people still interpret reactions that way?  I never have.  A negative reaction - even on platforms where a downvote does mean negative fake internet points - doesn’t mean, “I deem you a bad person.”  It means, “I didn’t like your content,” e.g. your post when it’s a forum.  That’s why the reaction is permanently tied to the post that triggered it.

This isn’t directed at Roland:

I don’t understand someone who takes, “I didn’t like something you wrote,” as a personal affront, that requires retaliation against something the reactor wrote.  No one would respond to a written out post that way, right?  If you write up a treatise on how to fix farming in A20, and someone says they think you’re all wrong in a reply, you don’t go looking for one of their posts to rant against out of spite, right?  Or if someone downvotes your YouTube video or your Reddit post, you don’t track down the user and downvote some of their content, and shake your fist if they’re just a lurker with nothing to downvote.

I guess my point is, there are Kuosimodos on every site where content has an up/down rating system (and as Roland points out, we don’t even have that).  Usually you don’t know or don’t care who they are; you just look at how people react in the aggregate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Crater Creator said:
I don’t understand someone who takes, “I didn’t like something you wrote,” as a personal affront, that requires retaliation against something the reactor wrote.  No one would respond to a written out post that way, right?  If you write up a treatise on how to fix farming in A20, and someone says they think you’re all wrong in a reply, you don’t go looking for one of their posts to rant against out of spite, right?  Or if someone downvotes your YouTube video or your Reddit post, you don’t track down the user and downvote some of their content, and shake your fist if they’re just a lurker with nothing to downvote.
Click to expand...
 
I think there is a big difference here because you can clearly see who reacted and in what way. I'm not saying it is any better or worse, but the forum kinda pushes things to a more personal level.

 
Crater Creator said:
Do people still interpret reactions that way?  I never have.  A negative reaction - even on platforms where a downvote does mean negative fake internet points - doesn’t mean, “I deem you a bad person.”  It means, “I didn’t like your content,” e.g. your post when it’s a forum.  That’s why the reaction is permanently tied to the post that triggered it.

This isn’t directed at Roland:

I don’t understand someone who takes, “I didn’t like something you wrote,” as a personal affront, that requires retaliation against something the reactor wrote.  No one would respond to a written out post that way, right?  If you write up a treatise on how to fix farming in A20, and someone says they think you’re all wrong in a reply, you don’t go looking for one of their posts to rant against out of spite, right?  Or if someone downvotes your YouTube video or your Reddit post, you don’t track down the user and downvote some of their content, and shake your fist if they’re just a lurker with nothing to downvote.

I guess my point is, there are Kuosimodos on every site where content has an up/down rating system (and as Roland points out, we don’t even have that).  Usually you don’t know or don’t care who they are; you just look at how people react in the aggregate.
Click to expand...
I think they were thinking more about Fox post that on your post here. 

AtomicUs5000 said:
 
I think there is a big difference here because you can clearly see who reacted and in what way. I'm not saying it is any better or worse, but the forum kinda pushes things to a more personal level.
Click to expand...
Well - i think this can be sad for some of us like - you spend halve of hour on making post and nobody wrote a word about that just you get 2 negative reaction so you think you just waste time

 
Matt115 said:
Well - i think this can be sad for some of us like - you spend halve of hour on making post and nobody wrote a word about that just you get 2 negative reaction so you think you just waste time
Click to expand...
 
I could be wrong, but I think in an earlier iteration of the forum, people had the opportunity to explain why their reaction was negative. This was optional of course, but at least you could sift out the valid thoughts from retaliation.

 
AtomicUs5000 said:
 
I could be wrong, but I think in an earlier iteration of the forum, people had the opportunity to explain why their reaction was negative. This was optional of course, but at least you could sift out the valid thoughts from retaliation.
Click to expand...
Well i think if you don't agree with someone the best option is quote this person and write why you think diffrent. Because it is contructive

 
Matt115 said:
Well i think if you don't agree with someone the best option is quote this person and write why you think diffrent. Because it is contructive
Click to expand...
 
You're probably right. Perhaps the removal of the post reputation is the best arrangement. I wouldn't complain although I do enjoy it and would miss it.

 
AtomicUs5000 said:
 
I could be wrong, but I think in an earlier iteration of the forum, people had the opportunity to explain why their reaction was negative. This was optional of course, but at least you could sift out the valid thoughts from retaliation.
Click to expand...
I miss that feature.

 
I guess I could split the thumbs down into one that has a tool tip that says "I don't agree with what you posted" and one that says "I don't like you".

But I'd rather live in denial... ;)

 
Matt115 said:
Well removal would be bad option but just "not adding" on begging would be good option
Click to expand...
 
react_confused.png

I'm not sure what not adding on begging means.
I thought we were talking about people leaving bad rep and not saying anything.
I assumed removal was what was desired because you can't have it ok to leave good rep without feedback, but then have it be un-ok to leave bad rep without it.

 
AtomicUs5000 said:
 

I'm not sure what not adding on begging means.
I thought we were talking about people leaving bad rep and not saying anything.
I assumed removal was what was desired because you can't have it ok to leave good rep without feedback, but then have it be un-ok to leave bad rep without it.
Click to expand...
begining of forum sorry grammar mistake i mean by this - it would be better if  rep would be never added 😅 sorry for that - even in my main language i write things diffrent so i don't see mistake so easy 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top