The missed post from JaWoodle

All these people saying Jawoodle "knew" is just as tin foil hat as any other speculation.
I would say there is a possibility he didn't know, though I think he did, but I would consider that just as bad. He made this game his job, so if he is making update videos on things he isn't even aware of, that's just unprofessional on his part. If he wants to call it a "business" and expect compensation he should probably take it more seriously.
 
What's fair? Asking Jawoodle to eat the cost financially for their mistake?
I know he mentioned it in his video, but I'd like to know what he would've called fair compensation. AFAIK, he mostly does his own editing. How much is an editor worth? What would re-editing a ~30 minute video to cut out a little bit cost? I feel like I could do it in maybe an hour, and I don't even remember how to use editing software, so I assume any competent video editor could do it in much less time. What does 30 minutes of work cost in this situation? Was he really willing to get into this mess over like $50?
 
So his invested time and equipment is considered to be for free? Editing software? Extra bandwith for streaming and uploading you don't need for just gaming?
Did he buy any of that just to make the videos that got taken down? Or did he already have it? TFP aren't responsible for his equipment. Lol.
 
Did he buy any of that just to make the videos that got taken down? Or did he already have it? TFP aren't responsible for his equipment. Lol.
So the Uber you call should not get paid cuz he already owned the car? Even volunteers are entitled to some form of compensation if they use their private owned means.
Sorry but what kind of world do you live in, Utopia?
 
So the Uber you call should not get paid cuz he already owned the car? Even volunteers are entitled to some form of compensation if they use their private owned means.
Sorry but what kind of world do you live in, Utopia?
I live in a world with properly laws.

And as I have said, if Jawoodle has lost money on the video when it was unpublished, then I think TFP should cover that loss.
 
So the Uber you call should not get paid cuz he already owned the car? Even volunteers are entitled to some form of compensation if they use their private owned means.
Sorry but what kind of world do you live in, Utopia?
If anything he would get paid for the time it took to make the video. But he wouldn't get anything for any equipment if he already had it.
 
The content removed is the video, not the game; he does "own" that.
The video disclosed features of 7DTD (graphics, behavior, gameplay, etc) which are owned by TFP and which they did not want to be disclosed to the public. The video contained IP owned by Woodle (his commentary, disposition, etc) and IP owned by TFP. An analogy could be a video recorded by me which happened to contain a painting by someone else or a soundtrack I did not have rights to.
 
He got a copyright strike based on breaching an NDA.
NDA's aren't meant to transfer rights. Even if an NDA does so, it might be thrown out in court. Filing a DMCA takedown over a "clean NDA" would be an abuse of the DMCA system.

An analogy could be a video recorded by me which happened to contain a painting by someone else or a soundtrack I did not have rights to.
Both can easily fall under Fair Use; so making strong claims about TFP owning the removed content is generally not advisable.
 
Both can easily fall under Fair Use; so making strong claims about TFP owning the removed content is generally not advisable.

I don't think disclosing features of a computer game which is not intended to be revealed to the public, will come close to "fair use". Fair use is more to use excerpts of texts or songs which are already published.
 
NDA's aren't meant to transfer rights. Even if an NDA does so, it might be thrown out in court. Filing a DMCA takedown over a "clean NDA" would be an abuse of the DMCA system.
As said we dont know what the NDA covers. If this goes to court we will know. You stating it doesnt, does not mean anything.
 
You stating it doesnt, does not mean anything.
This is not exactly an insult, but you can't seem to grasp context. I was arguing against someone going "TFP holds all the rights" ... by pointing out same CAN apply to JaWoodle as well. Yes, my statement is as empty as theirs without a court ruling / case law. That's the point of it.

I don't think disclosing features of a computer game which is not intended to be revealed to the public
Another point that would need to be measured in court - TFP provided THAT build to do content on, it Was delivered as something to publicize.

You can't just go "therefore TFP is right" after that.
 
If anything he would get paid for the time it took to make the video. But he wouldn't get anything for any equipment if he already had it.
Are you for real???
Any professional you hire brings his tools. it might not be specified in detail but for sure the use of his tools is included in the hourly rate. Why do we even have this discussion, are you just troling?
 
Another point that would need to be measured in court - TFP provided THAT build to do content on, it Was delivered as something to publicize.

You can't just go "therefore TFP is right" after that.

People are allowed to make mistakes. If Mick Jagger sent me the next unreleased Rolling Stones album, I would not be allowed to publish it. It wouldn't be mine because they made a mistake.

And because they made a mistake, Woodle would likely never be legally punished for the initial posting of the video. But as soon as he was told of the mistake and that TFP wanted the video unpublished, he was obliged to unpublish it. And then in my opinion TFP should cover any losses he might have incurred up to that point, and if not, a judge would likely rule that way regardless.
 
Back
Top