That was my point, too. We're in agreement.Relax everyone no need for a #gate over this. It's just new commented out code.
If you want to pin me down, what needed correcting was the word "will." Jax said zombies will one day attack all these things. That's not speculative; it implies certainty. "Could" would imply speculation. Now my goal wasn't to nitpick, but inevitably someone will latch onto that claimed certainty if it's not made abundantly clear, which is indeed what Rumbaar did:No, you had ppl just commenting on a "What If", A "conversation piece". Jax made it pretty clear it was a speculation post. It's what ppl do. There's nothing to correct. PPL understand this is just for conversation and just a fun post. Jax nor anyone else is stating anything as fact and I tend to believe ppl know this. They're just stating what they would think about 'IF' XYZ happens how they wouldn't like it.
Really, I was echoing what others like graphite had already said: "I would not read into it too much at the moment..."Dang, can't park a bike, loot and come out with it not touched soon? Backpack, nice .... so the 20m timer and now the zombie(s) that kill you will also destroy your backpack while you run the km's back to pick it up?
If you remove the escape sequences from the template who knows what undefined behavior it might have at best memory resources will be continuously aquired but never deallocated spiralling out of control with no gc and with it running on baremetal at ring zero the heap goes up the stack comes down and kaboom.What if you were to uncomment them?
Last year a few of us got a working driveable car.What if you were to uncomment them?