If you zoom in to 500% and open the image in a new tab, it will be displayed in high resolution. The higher the zoom, the higher the resolution the image will be opened in a new tab. I do not know why it works this way. @Roland, could you convey this to those who are involved in the site?
This is not a website, but a browser. Chrom behaves this way, but Firefox does not.
I use Firefox, and it works like this.
Apparently I didn't understand you correctly.
The thought occurred to me in another instance of this topic: How are microtransactions supposed to work in a mod-supported game run on community administered servers? What incentive is there for anyone to buy even "cosmetic" items, with or without bonuses, when mod authors will be producing them for free or maybe a pittance in donations? It doesn't make any sense. That's just one more reason I sincerely hope TFP will contemplate this one far more thoroughly. And just how much, if anything, does this have to do with console manufacturer's demands anyway? Console users are accustomed to having to pay to install anything, whether created by a mod author or not, on a console system. PC players, otoh, are not and this is technically a multiplayer game.
Yeah, it's just an issue with the preview window. Open it in a new tab/window and you'll see original size (up to monitor resolution). At 1080p, it's pretty readable, though not perfect. At higher resolutions, it should be very easy to read. In reality, the original image should be at a lower resolution. They clearly wanted to have it at a high resolution, but that's a problem for people who aren't at that resolution as resizing it down causes it to be harder to read. It would be better for the original image size to not exceed 1080p, which I think most people are at, if they aren't at a higher resolution than that. Even in the preview window, a 1080p sized image should still be legible even though it's smaller in the preview.
What I'm saying, which I thought seemed pretty clear, is we're operating naturally, exactly as we're supposed to at this given time period. Just like everything else, for good or ill. We're primates using artificial systems to help bring us together in numbers too large for our biological, primate tendencies. Put 1000 chimps together and watch them rip each other apart.Business ethics are social as they involve "employees, customers, society, the environment, shareholders and stakeholders" (actually, human beings all), not personal moral codes. The comparison of human beings to asteroids is...well, too absurd to approach, really. Not saying you're absurd, just the asteroid example.
Hey. Why do you have to make it personal? Why would you assume I'm speaking about myself? I'm speaking for the people.
This suggests that if a person considers something valuable to himself, then he will save it.
The philosophy of Naturalism is very popular today I think, in part, because Western civilization lost touch with its roots somewhere along the way, specifically around the time of Isaac Newton and the burgeoning Mechanical philosophy. We've neglected our home, "the only home we've ever known," as Carl Sagan put it. The Church and its injunction of "dominion over" as opposed to stewardship of Nature didn't help matters in the least, but there appears to be a course correction underway at this point. Civilization appears to be learning once again to work with Nature's systems as opposed to trying to control, change or dominate them, though there are some branches of the sciences, e.g. bio- and geoengineering, that apparently haven't received the memo just yet. You'll see this course correction in the writings of scientists such as Adam Frank and Marcelo Gleiser (a professor of Naturalism, actually) who eschew reductionism and admit that the sciences' quest for the Theory of Everything is misguided, at best, etc. You'll also see it in the writings of authors such as Sufi teacher, Llewellyn Vaughan-Lee, and others in various historically repressed religious traditions, e.g. the Christian contemplative tradition, as well as the Pope's encyclical, Laudito Si. Indigenous wisdom also has never been more popular, obviously.
Honestly, I have to wonder why they don't just wrap it up and move on to another project. Honestly, I think it has something to do with that "death spiral" mentioned earlier -- a minority of players determined to "exploit" any kind of system TFP might implement and TFP saying, "Erm, no. You're not doing that."
Riiight. Like they're going to cost $1.99. More like ten bucks, maybe more. And I wouldn't discount mod authors abilitites quite so easily. "Modlets" are nothing. Just change a few variables in a few XML files. No big deal. But the modding community of gaming in general is full of exceptionally talented, creative people who are more than capable of producing "professional" quality mods. (Think Sim Settlements and Fallout: London.) So, I'm still just not seeing the incentive in a game made by gamers for gamers that is run on community servers for anyone but console manufacturers.
The roadmap shows that they are wrapping it up. It has been clear in the latest alphas that they are polishing things like art and animations for a final product. And they are already working on the next project with a different group of developers.
. My theorem of everything is to get a decent drink on Friday Night and go to sleep.Then, they are not working on it, are they? The other company is developing that game using assets from 7DTD.
Yeah. That's been covered in previous comments. There has yet to be turn in public sentiment about video game "cosmetics". The idea has been normalized to the point that most don't question it. The public turn may happen; it may not; but I imagine as everything gets worse for everyone, it will. By that time, though, most of us will be just scraping by, if that, and the "issue" will be moot.
I am not talking about Blood Moons. TFP is working on their next project using their own people, but people who are different from those currently working on this game.