PC Developer Discussions: Alpha 17

[Xtrakicking]

There are perverts in any large enough group. Some zombies may prefer, you know... intestines and stuff.
<shudders>

Let's be honest, we're all perverts.

 

[beerfly]

Let's be honest, we're all perverts.

So you sell icecream ?

 

[meganoth]

Let's be honest, we're all perverts.

No to both. :mask:

 

[Xtrakicking]

So you sell icecream ?

They're in the back of the van. Why don't you go get them?

 

[beerfly]

They're on the back of the van. Why don't you go get them?

Gonna get my machette first )

 

[meandog1000]

Hm, not bad idea, but having too much boom in a voxel game is like a destruction party, not a survival . And yea I need explosives to shut the hell up the snoring person in my room from this new year`s party. I need a lot.
P.S. snoring zeds ..this big mama can`t be so quiet.

Hmm... I usually use molotov plus assault rifle/SMG. Lot less boom but still a good amount of death.

 

[IrishGhost]

molotovs are the best

 

[meandog1000]

molotovs are the best

If only you could set buildings on fire.

 

[Xtrakicking]

If only you could set buildings on fire.

That was supposed to be a feature. I wonder if they're still planning on adding it or if it's too much for the framerate to endure.

 

[The Gronk]

That was supposed to be a feature. I wonder if they're still planning on adding it or if it's too much for the framerate to endure.

It's not just the frame-rate issue, although that's a big thing. On a multi-player server anything that can be burned down will be burned down.

 

[Dagzambie]

It's not just the frame-rate issue, although that's a big thing. On a multi-player server anything that can be burned down will be burned down.

Some gamers just want to watch the world burn...

 

[The Gronk]

Some gamers just want to watch the world burn...

I'd still like it as an option though. If only for that moment you throw a molotov badly and set fire to your own base at the very beginning of a horde night.

Do you prioritize the fire or thin the Z's out a bit and hope your walls don't burn down?

 

[Xtrakicking]

It's not just the frame-rate issue, although that's a big thing. On a multi-player server anything that can be burned down will be burned down.

What if only certain things could catch on fire? Concrete, for example, could be one of the things that can't be burned down. Steel, scrap metal... etc. That is, never make your base out of wood.

 

[IrishGhost]

Would there be a point to going the wood route then over cobble?

 

[Xtrakicking]

Would there be a point to going the wood route then over cobble?

There is no point now anyways, so unless they change it I think it wouldn't matter.

 

[IrishGhost]

You're right, cobble is superior in everyway. Only go wood for the challenge

 

[beerfly]

If only you could set buildings on fire.

With all the loot inside them ? Hell no. Partly ? Yes!

 

[Xtrakicking]

With all the loot inside them ? Hell no. Partly ? Yes!

That's part of the fun. Imagine seeing a building on fire and rushing in to get all the stuff before it gets burned. Also, imagine the quests. Save someone trapped inside a burning building, set a bandit's outpost on fire while they're sleeping... etc.

It would be a lot of fun for natural pyromaniacs such as me.

 

[Gamida]

Don't know if there is anyone who hasn't seen this yet but thought I would throw it out there anyway...

 

[sillls]

That's part of the fun. Imagine seeing a building on fire and rushing in to get all the stuff before it gets burned. Also, imagine the quests. Save someone trapped inside a burning building, set a bandit's outpost on fire while they're sleeping... etc.
It would be a lot of fun for natural pyromaniacs such as me.

I love this!

But it may be awhile till we see this in a voxel game.

OO WOW! I guess I spoke too soon.