wolffblood
New member
yes, and if you noticed, I was comparing about running games on near high/max settings. So to do that with all games, you have to update often whereas on console, they are typically same graphics other than 4k. No changing between low/medium/high/ultra/whatever level. If you want to play on all low graphics and short view distance, yeah, you can buy a $400 or $500 computer, and then have to upgrade it in a couple years to keep it once again enough to run low graphics if not sooner. I have a computer that's 4 years old that I'm playing this game on, but it's typically low graphics and short view distance. Rather play it on my newer one where I can typically do mostly high with medium distance. Still rather have more, but don't have the money.There is your misinterpretation... if you want to have the most state of the art gaming system yes you will spend money. Is it comparable to buying a new console every ~2 years? Well if you add it all together yeah it is...
You can also buy video cards in the $150 range that are quite good and can run most games on min or med quality.
I built my first gaming rig myself over 10 years ago and only built a new one 2 years ago after I couldn't get anymore out of my system.
The PC will always provide a superior experience because the hardware is standardized and open to the free market to compete for your money to fill those spots. On the other side consoles are designed to have a limited shelf life and are meant to mimic a pc like experience.
Unfortunately the price is the one major factor where consoles can sort of stand up, they are less expensive then staying at the top end of pc gaming constantly. Can you get value out of buying good hardware that isn't the most expensive? Definitely, but spend your money wisely, people who buy the top end of the hardware spectrum are doing 2 things, they are paying the most, and they are beta testing new hardware.