There are crowdfunding models where you really can invest in a game (Fig for example), but backers on kickstarter are NOT investors. They are only making a combined donation and purchase.
Meganoth seriously thank you for the correction. Personally I have
been researching funding for my own micronized power supply. I
pondered the thought of whether to continue independently or apply
with Kickstarter.
The statement regarding backers as being investors was my independant
thought, because, of the kickstarter model. In legal terms, which i'm
re-investigating now, they are backers, or pledgers. In layman terms, I
actually thought they were investors because they submitted, specific
quantities of money, for an expected specific yield.
Though not from financial reciprocity, they pledged and sent money,
with a direct expectation of receiving different levels of (perks).
A t-shirt, charater addition to the game,honorable mentions,
plane tickets and invites. The financial remuneration was sought by
The brothers and eventually their team. Much of this seems to be
reworded contractual agreements akin to IPO/stock offers.
Everyone else that has purchased the game from Steam, or other electronic
distribution media, would be concidered consumers. The argument presented
interested me, because of my own external life goals. It also has an applied
statement that, I am an investor, in Toyota-Nissan-Microsoft etc. because
I bought their product, they are continuations of said products, each has had
recalls because of bugs and each receives yearly upgrades.
The statement, also made me think seriously, about the fact that, an individual
consumer, that pays as little as $1 for a product would therein and or thereafter
be granted the right, either real or imagined to my internal business process.
Once again thanks for the edification, Ill just build mine and sell the patent
to a corporation.