Demonic skyrim armour in a survival game?

It's okay not to like it, its only an oppotional DLC cosmetic. Maybe there can be server option one day for no DLC cosmetics for those who don't want to see them in their MP server.
yes please, consider to add this option for server in future! In addition, remove vanilla armours from cosmetics
And about this spefici demonic armour - ihmo it doesnt fit the game theme at all, while other skins from 2.5 are + - okay
 
Last edited:
It's okay not to like it, its only an oppotional DLC cosmetic. Maybe there can be server option one day for no DLC cosmetics for those who don't want to see them in their MP server.

WoT has this. You can opt of seeing non historical tank skins.
 
People thinking a single optional DLC cosmetic set will make or break peoples' perception of the game is silly. If that is truly all it takes then they would have found something else that ruins the game for them if it wasn't the cosmetic. Do you have nothing better to do than cry about something as useless as a cosmetic? If you don't like it then don't buy it, simple.
 
As one who doesnt play in public servers, I would say your comment lacks understanding of the issue.
When did I say I don't play public servers? I am well aware you could be on a server and see someone else using it. Point still stands, people need to quit being whiny brats. Hell, it's the end of the world in the game, who's to say some cosplayer didn't decide to run around in some cool armor they made? This just proves no matter what TFP do, people will complain about the most useless ■■■■.
 
When did I say I don't play public servers?

I was speaking for myself, apologize for the confusion.

As for the CoS player, I guess maybe, yikes, but unlikely.
Post automatically merged:

Other games have the option to turn it off. I am all about options.
 
I was speaking for myself, apologize for the confusion.
I kind of thought maybe you were, but saying that and then saying I lacked understanding made think you meant me. Haha.

And yes, options are always nice but come on, at a point it gets ridiculous. Every single tiny piece of the game can't become an option. It's not like the armor is truly offensive, as I'm assuming some of the WoT tank skins you referenced likely can be to certain people. This is not the same thing at all.
 
It's not like the armor is truly offensive, as I'm assuming some of the WoT tank skins you referenced likely can be to certain people. This is not the same thing at all.
I'm all for the position of "if you have PTSD, you might not want to play tank games"; but I also see very little harm in people expressing their opinion of "this 2500 C dude wearing a metal armor is a little unimmersive in my zombie survival game" ...
 
Last edited:
Meh, to each their own, but I'd rather not know they spent a second of dev time putting in an option to hide a DLC set because a few people cried about it on the forum. Too many other things they could put that time towards.
 
I'm all for the position of "if you have PTSD, you might not to play tank games"; but I also see very little harm in people expressing their opinion of "this 2500 C dude wearing a metal armor is a little unimmersive in my zombie survival game" ...

I don't think it's PTSD, I just didn't think it applies to the genre like digging zombies, and why i have block damage for them at minimum, but might be in the minority there as well.

Some just want to see pure armor "historical" camo paint, some don't want to see tanks turned into pimp mobiles /shrugs.

I believe the same applies here.
 
Meh, to each their own, but I'd rather not know they spent a second of dev time putting in an option to hide a DLC set because a few people cried about it on the forum. Too many other things they could put that time towards.
I also think it is a dumb thing to be upset about even though I personally don't like weird stuff in my games. One reason I didn't bother getting that pimp hat. So I can see why some people might not like seeing those in a MP game. But as far as dev time goes, sure it is more than a second, but it's not likely to be that much. All it takes is a switch to disable viewing of non-vanilla armor in the cosmetic screen if enabled (or disabled, depending on how they name the option). That could be done in under 15 minutes (probably under 5 minutes) - the switch could be done in 30 seconds or less, but it takes a bit longer to update the UI with the option. So I don't think it's going to have any real impact on dev time. But I also think it's not really a big deal. I just wouldn't play MP with people who wear it if I didn't like seeing it. I think the game is better when playing with friends or family anyhow.
 
It looks cool, but it IS a pretty weird choice. Especially after so many players brought up the silliness of a Skyrim yeti and a mummy roaming around and convinced the Pimps to change those models.
 
Funny things I don't sense upset, unless bringing something up means some one is upset?

Anyways...
Just a figure of speech. To be more clear on what I meant, you can replace "be upset" with "complain".
Post automatically merged:

It looks cool, but it IS a pretty weird choice. Especially after so many players brought up the silliness of a Skyrim yeti and a mummy roaming around and convinced the Pimps to change those models.
Very good point. You'd think that would have made them rethink any idea of adding cosmetics that don't fit the game.
 
It looks cool, but it IS a pretty weird choice. Especially after so many players brought up the silliness of a Skyrim yeti and a mummy roaming around and convinced the Pimps to change those models.
I'd think that would be TFP's concern, but they don't seem at all concerned. They're going to have their Atomic Shop if it kills 'em. Most unfortunate that established games are being retrofitted with that garbage. Skyrim, FO4. Formerly physical "merch" is turning into virtual "merch" that's going to go "poof" as soon as live service games, especially, go offline, not to mention the 'subscription models" and the fact that we don't own the games we buy anymore. The tech sector at its hubristic zenith. Can't even play games now without constantly keeping a vigil against psychological manipulation of every kind nor being reminded of predatory industry practices. Edward Bernays would be proud. And, of course, all our formerly favorite studios (BGS, Arkane, Bioware, CD Projekt, et al.) are never going to recover their reputations thanks to their owners, entities such as Zenimax and Microsoft, which care only about quarterly profits and exponential "growth" and not the first thing about video games or video game players and developers. Most everyone is going to defend the trend in the gaming industy with "I'm not going to tell anyone else what to do with their money," but of course that's not the point. It's investment firms, with their fingers in everything from education to healthcare to housing to Social Security to Medicare and Medicaid to "prison reform" -- well, everything -- that are driving the trends in triple A and all of us into the poor house. Indies and AAs are just adopting the practices that will make them the most money.

The stock market has only relatively recently taken an interest in the gaming industry. The last decade or so. Investment firms tell our governments they can handle everything more "efficiently" and "cost-effectively" than the public sector and our governments gleefully turn their reponsibilities over to them. Publishers and studios and, even, we may not realize it, but we're all feeding the beast.

"We'll go down in history as the first society that wouldn't save itself because it wasn't cost effective." ~ Kurt Vonnegut

Am I upset about it? No. Do I care what anyone else does with their money? No. That's their business. I wouldn't mind seeing a lot more connecting the dots going on among the public, but we're going to have to be in pretty desperate straights for that to happen as far as I can tell. Seems to me we already are.
 
Last edited:
It's mostly comical to see the comments from people who think that nobody should be critical of anything TFP does. Starting with "I don't care for this thing." followed by "It's not ok that you don't like this thing."

I don't see people saying it's not ok to not like the armor, only pointing out some people are acting like it's some game breaking addition.

Personally, I don't think I'm going to buy any of these armors, but it's not a big deal either way. It would be a different matter if they gave bonuses but they don't.

Adding the option to disable would work, but then those who bought the skins would get angry at the server owners disabling them. ;)
 
Back
Top