If i knew you were on the forums I would have just @ you lmaoThanks for the mention and great summarisation of the updates so far
Yeahhh..... I really hope they cooked with the bandits. I just hope we got enough models. Not fighting the same dude right next to the other dudebandits in a23... and they were announced at alpha 16. I feel betrayed![]()
I mean with the force optimization for consoles. I'm sure we will get some helpIn Alpha 22 are we stuck getting 35 fps on a rtx 4090 doing a city highrise quests because DEVs will not touch any optimisation away from CPU to GPU and it's GPU features because "It's alpha !" ?
Also they literally said they're adding significant ambient occlusion, which is pretty important.
I really hope so, I usually stop playing around tier 5 quests, the frame rate makes my eyes bleed or I just stay away from cities a roll with tier 4s.
*fingers crossed*
In Alpha 22 are we stuck getting 35 fps on a rtx 4090 doing a city highrise quests because DEVs will not touch any optimisation away from CPU to GPU and it's GPU features because "It's alpha !" ?
Tier 5 quests are certainly a big jump in time to complete compared to the earlier tiers and the rewards may not be worth it in single player for many people. The speed you can compete tier 4 for similar rewards can make that a better choice for many players. Of course, when you know the tier 5 well, you can usually solo those fairly quickly. I personally like the jump for tier 5 because the others are too easy and complete too quickly.I feel like for a solo/single player tier 5 locations are too overly complex. For 3-4 players tier 5 quests are easy tasks somehow. Finally, for the merciful love of God, devs could consider the introduction of proper naming for at least tier 5 locations. Running through Shamway factory for the 3rd time in a row is no joke (generic_location_5 is really not a good indicator of where players are stepping in) . Also, there should be a challenge in the game like beating all 5 tier level locations and tier 6! Players would have some sense of completion at the end of the day idk.
Playable, yes. But I wouldn't use the word "smoothly". 35fps, especially on a high refresh rate monitor, is an uncomfortable experience.As far as 35 FPS goes, that is enough to play a game smoothly without any problems.
Me as a mostly console peasant knows 30 fps very well but at least most games now are at about 60 or lessPlayable, yes. But I wouldn't use the word "smoothly". 35fps, especially on a high refresh rate monitor, is an uncomfortable experience.
I used to download Unforgiven by Metallica for about 2 days and burning a CD with 9 songs took about an hour, including not touching my PC.Back in my day we measured seconds per frame.
I used to download Unforgiven by Metallica for about 2 days and burning a CD with 9 songs took about an hour, including not touching my PC.
Good, very good times that I am thankful we were part of![]()