No. in l4d2 you can easy spot how zombie looks like - a lot of them are in idle mode - this woman is barefoot , there is a soldier, this zombie cop have nightstick etc. btw. there is even many PoI connected variants - patients, nurse and docs in hospital, stuff in airport etc. So you don't have clone attack syndrome. And to be honest - people looks diffrent - so zombies shoulds looks diffrent too. i'm sure someone could ran away from home just in PJ and became infected. So you can say - this one was cop, this was probably was infected in home , this one was infected during weeding etc. so make game more immersive
Still the same zombie though, but yes different looks and all with the feral having yellow glowing eyes and the radiated green look with the radiated zombies, I know the coding is different.
Because 7 Days To Die is not a clone of Left 4 Dead
Because 7 Days To Die is not a clone of Left 4 Dead
If you want to play Left 4 Dead, you go and play Left 4 Dead.Imagine that all the games will start copying whole fragments of other games.You are tired of Left 4 Dead, you want something different in the zombie world, you go to 7D2D and see whole fragments of Left 4 Dead there.That would be very strange.Some people want to see pieces of dying light in 7D2D.Wouldn't it be easier to go play those games that are more interesting to you now?You can take things from other games, but not stupidly copy, but come up with something of your own.TFP didn't copy zombies from l4d or DL, they created zombies, which you will remember for a long time.Some people like it, some don't, but that's how they see their game.They don't see their game assembled from fragments of other games.
There is such a cool mod for GTA SA, which is called Zombie Andreas (not advertising).So there are all ordinary and unique zombies, stupidly copied from Left 4 Dead.You can admire it and even play for a couple of hours.But if the mod developers hadn't implemented a lot of different mechanics, you would have lost interest in this mod after a couple of hours, because, apart from the zombies from Left 4 Dead, there would be nothing interesting there.
When I played Left 4 Dead, I chose a heavy difficulty level and all I did was run and shoot.I didn't have time to stand and look at the zombies and the surroundings.If you stopped, you died.Perhaps it depends on the style of play and views on the game.I'm not trying to force you to take my point of view, I'm just sharing it.
I agree that simple zombies, feral and radioactive should visually differ more from each other.
That's the thing, that in many games "ordinary" zombies. TFP didn't want to do as in many games.There are those templates that are used when creating games, TV series and movies about zombies.But no one is obliged to always follow these patterns.
I think my answer was confusing... A tier 1 infestation quest will be in a tier 1 POI with tier 2 parameters (approximately as that is up to the POI designers, I think). The trader won't give you a tier 6 infestation quest. It will be labeled tier 5. And you won't have tier 6 POI. The tier 5 infestation quests will use tier 5 POI.
Why? I'm not sure what you are referring to being false advertising.
Actually, the wording on that may be accurate. It states 50+ "including" infected. That means that part of that number are the infected zombies. If they are counting infected in that number, then you pretty much expect to count every variation. That means that for every unique zombie, you count 3. And some animals have zombie variations as well. These would all be counted towards the 50+ based on the use of "including". If they had said "in addition to" or "as well as" then those wouldn't be counted towards that 50+.
I made an 8k map the other day and it took 3.5 mins. Granted, this is on my new PC, which is a AMD 7950x.
Interesting. I'll keep an eye on that thread. If it works well, then we may support it.
Yes.
I was also wondering if FP could leverage the dismemberment system and new character creation system to allow a greater variety of zombie appearances.
Well. That's easy.I wonder, just a bit, but enough, what is @Kuosimodo`s opinion on first stream about A21 ?
*hiding under the bed*
He sent me a very private message, a screamers are gonna be all around you. Very soon. Inevitable, don`t mock him, sir.Well. That's easy.
@Kuosimodo: you can put a reaction to this post of mine this way:
- "Like" - if you liked the Dev Stream
- "Thumb Down" - if you didn't like it
- "Knuckle Rub" - if you liked some things and didn't like other things (not impressed / average)
The problem with player-made blocks is that the game doesn't track what players create. A block is a block as far as the game is concerned. That's why things like preventing zombie spawns are tied to beds and land claims rather than your base. They wouldn't reset a chunk where a land claim is located. I doubt they'd add an option to enable resetting a land claim chunk as that would just upset everyone if it was enabled. For a server that keeps a game running for a long time, I think just having land claims destroyed after X time without the player logged in might be an option that isn't too "dangerous", though if someone else was using the base and didn't get a new land claim down, they could still lose stuff and be upset. Either way, I don't think an option to enable chunk resets of land claim areas is going to be available.