Adam the Waster
Well-known member
That would make more senseĀand zombie with... let's say not enough clothesĀ
Well... i think cheeleader could be replaced with "sport girl"
View attachment 29937
That would make more senseĀand zombie with... let's say not enough clothesĀ
Well... i think cheeleader could be replaced with "sport girl"
View attachment 29937
Well... i think cheeleader could be replaced with "sport girl"
add something like this??something like this would be awesome
View attachment 29932View attachment 29931View attachment 29930
View attachment 29929
There is that one mod that adds wetlands/swamps to the game with new pois to go with them but that's the only one I know ofĀFranticDan said:Plains biome got removed in A17 if I recall. We even used to have two different forest biomes.
Please link me to a mod that adds new biomes to the game.
Unless it was a man-made mash aka just a flooded forest a poormans swamp, it wouldn't make sense.Ā Too be in ArizonaĀThe game is intended to represent Arizona, so I can understand why a swamp biome doesn't make the final cut- but that said, as someone that lives in the wetlands- Knobby cypress knees, tangle-y vegetation, and 'gators.. All of this would be so very welcome in an apocalyptic nightmare. (...Maybe as a DLC.)
Navezgane is supposed to be based in Arizona, RWG could be anywhere. a swamp biome is very appropiate for a zombie based game in my opinionThe game is intended to represent Arizona, so I can understand why a swamp biome doesn't make the final cut- but that said, as someone that lives in the wetlands- Knobby cypress knees, tangle-y vegetation, and 'gators.. All of this would be so very welcome in an apocalyptic nightmare. (...Maybe as a DLC.)
In the post-apo version of Arizona, climate change might go quite nuclear... I wouldn`t have anything against more variable environments like marshes, swamps, open green plains, and so on. New RWGs might also represent the climate of the entire US... why limit yourself only to Arizona aka Navezgane state?tbf all im gonna say is who cares about the real world arizona's enviornment? more environments is probs for the better with 7 days im in agreeance with goldenfox
Unless it was a man-made mash aka just a flooded forest a poormans swamp, it wouldn't make sense.Ā Too be in ArizonaĀ
I looked at some but I'm sure they could take creative liberty with it and you also gotta think how it would realistic look in game.Ā Like the water biomeĀThe web tells me there are 33 swamps in AZ. I don't know any of them personally. Perhaps all/some/many are man-made and the pictures don't necessarily give me a creepy remote bayou feel, but maybe there's enough to say "sure, let's do a swamp biome" ... ?
I understand that, but how can a game just continue to be in Early Access and NEVER finish? How is that an acceptable business model?If you want a finished game DO NOT BUY EARLY ACCESS GAMES.Ā
it is perfectly fine to want a finished game, it is perfectly fine to have your own wants & needs. Buying a game that is clearly stated as not finished/complete and complaining that itās not finished or complete is not fine.
It hasn't from what I can tell. Rendering on the game when I'm on a faster vehicle is terrible. Cars will spawn in the middle of the road when I'm a foot away from them or won't even spawn at all and I will hit an invisible car.This alpha should help out with optimization
I understand that, but how can a game just continue to be in Early Access and NEVER finish? How is that an acceptable business model?
I ment alpha 22It hasn't from what I can tell. Rendering on the game when I'm on a faster vehicle is terrible. Cars will spawn in the middle of the road when I'm a foot away from them or won't even spawn at all and I will hit an invisible car.