PC Alpha 21 Dev Diary

Status
Not open for further replies.
FranticDan said:
Plains biome got removed in A17 if I recall. We even used to have two different forest biomes.

Please link me to a mod that adds new biomes to the game.
There is that one mod that adds wetlands/swamps to the game with new pois to go with them but that's the only one I know ofĀ 

 
The game is intended to represent Arizona, so I can understand why a swamp biome doesn't make the final cut- but that said, as someone that lives in the wetlands- Knobby cypress knees, tangle-y vegetation, and 'gators.. All of this would be so very welcome in an apocalyptic nightmare. (...Maybe as a DLC.)

 
The game is intended to represent Arizona, so I can understand why a swamp biome doesn't make the final cut- but that said, as someone that lives in the wetlands- Knobby cypress knees, tangle-y vegetation, and 'gators.. All of this would be so very welcome in an apocalyptic nightmare. (...Maybe as a DLC.)
Unless it was a man-made mash aka just a flooded forest a poormans swamp, it wouldn't make sense.Ā  Too be in ArizonaĀ 

But dlc would be kinda neet

 
The game is intended to represent Arizona, so I can understand why a swamp biome doesn't make the final cut- but that said, as someone that lives in the wetlands- Knobby cypress knees, tangle-y vegetation, and 'gators.. All of this would be so very welcome in an apocalyptic nightmare. (...Maybe as a DLC.)
Navezgane is supposed to be based in Arizona, RWG could be anywhere. a swamp biome is very appropiate for a zombie based game in my opinion

 
tbf all im gonna say is who cares about the real world arizona's enviornment? more environments is probs for the better with 7 days im in agreeance with goldenfox
In the post-apo version of Arizona, climate change might go quite nuclear... I wouldn`t have anything against more variable environments like marshes, swamps, open green plains, and so on. New RWGs might also represent the climate of the entire US... why limit yourself only to Arizona aka Navezgane state?

 
To be honest - Swamp Biom would be great but it would need own POI , new zombie variants so... too much of work. Maybe as dlc but unlikly

 
Unless it was a man-made mash aka just a flooded forest a poormans swamp, it wouldn't make sense.Ā  Too be in ArizonaĀ 


The web tells me there are 33 swamps in AZ. I don't know any of them personally. Perhaps all/some/many are man-made and the pictures don't necessarily give me a creepy remote bayou feel, but maybe there's enough to say "sure, let's do a swamp biome" ... ?

 
The web tells me there are 33 swamps in AZ. I don't know any of them personally. Perhaps all/some/many are man-made and the pictures don't necessarily give me a creepy remote bayou feel, but maybe there's enough to say "sure, let's do a swamp biome" ... ?
I looked at some but I'm sure they could take creative liberty with it and you also gotta think how it would realistic look in game.Ā  Like the water biomeĀ 

Make it 2 skulls, have crawlers and maybe naturally spawning feral zombies or even spider zombies thicker trees, dirt, sand and gravel on the ground.Ā  Water alots of dirty stinky water

Screenshot_20240221_124344_YouTube.jpg

 
If you want a finished game DO NOT BUY EARLY ACCESS GAMES.Ā 
it is perfectly fine to want a finished game, it is perfectly fine to have your own wants & needs. Buying a game that is clearly stated as not finished/complete and complaining that it’s not finished or complete is not fine.
I understand that, but how can a game just continue to be in Early Access and NEVER finish? How is that an acceptable business model?

 
I understand that, but how can a game just continue to be in Early Access and NEVER finish? How is that an acceptable business model?


They're still in business. Isn't that the true measure of a business model?

You might consider their development practices to be atypical for software development in the gaming industry. (It isn't atypical in the wider world of software development.) That doesn't mean it is unacceptable. Your argument is what my friends call a "Dogs Playing Poker" discussion. (Is it art, or not? -- There's no right or wrong answer.) You're essentially expressing an opinion that "it's not art."

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top