Recent content by InfiniteWarrior

I imagine so. RIP Dishong. But it's the sudden rush for whatever reason (guessing console release) in which things seem to be getting...er, not sloppy but maybe just overlooked. Is it crunch time? That's definitely the impression I'm getting of late despite that no developers should have to...

If I just had to reload to fix it I probably wouldn't even notice gun jams, much less worry about quality and condition. In that split second, I'd probably think it was just out of ammo, so reload. Not much reason to implement them in that event. As with EvilPolygons, I've never thought about it...

I don't think we're going to see anything but bugfixing after 4.0 unless a TFP member pulls a Josh Sawyer and produces mods on his own time and dime. The game doesn't use Taragon and RWG is one of a very few big features, so RWG needs to be the best it can be out the door. If it's low priority...

I certainly wouldn't demand something be added back or else. Or else what? "I'll leave you a bad review?" (Oh, boo-hoo.) Thing is: console and PC. Sure, PC players can add back or create anew or, in fact, do anything they like and customize it to the hilt. Where does that leave the vanilla game...

Was it "bad" or just incomplete? I'll say it to my dying day: if a player is motivated for whatever reason, conceivable and otherwise, to find ways around mechanics, they'll do it no matter what kind of system you implement. That is, after all, how speed runners do their thing. No system will...

If each only has parts, we're not seeing the whole. I'd cite The Blind Men and the Elephant as symbolic of an inability to see the whole, but it shouldn't be necessary. A compromise is when one "side" has to surrender to the other "side" and no one wants to be compromised. That's corruption...

I wouldn't call that a compromise. I'd call it well thought through. It obviously wouldn't make sense to develop a game two completely different ways and provide an option of which completely different game to play, but as you note, that's in no way necessary. I've read all the comments about...

You know what "compromised "means, right? Not great in the grander sheme of things. That doesn't stike me as both-and. It actually somewhat stikes me as defeatism, but maybe that's just me.

As for "chasing trends." Show me one development studio that isn't doing that from Bethesda to Obsidian and I'll eat my shorts.

Not necessarily, imo. Again, it's a not a question of either/or but both-and. I'll leave it to the technicists to debate the...technicalities.

They're odd jobs. Quests actually have you questing, i.e. going on grand adventures, solving mysteries, resolving (or not) factional conflicts, etc. Sorry, but I'll never allow myself to get used to repetitive, random bs being called "quests." (Beth's "radiant" system is not at all "radiant" to...

They're removing the biome restrictions, last I heard. I'd prefer a gear-based system to those icons and magical meals/drinks myself. The more arcadey it gets, the less I like it. They're just giving the smoothies a facelift, but there would be complaints galore about having to switch out gear...

Off it or on it. If you've moved the vehicle and look at the map, the icon remains where it was. I couldn't tell you when exactly it disappears without a step by step test on video, but I'm pretty sure it disappears when you get off the vehicle again. It then moves to the vehicle's present...

It's not as it moves. There's a bike icon on the map at the last place I stopped as though I need to go pick it up when I'm on the bike and headed somewhere else. No games crashes, which is why that happened only once upon a time. No lost bikes in the game. Nothing to account for the icon...

Aee we sure streamers don't just want to give themselves a free helmet light or be restricted to a single weapon hand with a torch and blame it on their audiences? I mean, that headlamp is pretty darn bright. ;) j/k Audiences do complain about that, but the better streamers and YouTubers who do...