The missed post from JaWoodle

Exactly.
So... to summarize.

Before TFP reached to him:
  • He was the only streamer-weekend streamer in Australia that received the wrong version while others could get the right one.
  • He was the only streamer in Australia with the wrong version using creative mode
  • He was the only streamer (in the world) that didn't know that bandits weren't supposed to be in 3.0
  • He was the only streamer who had the idea of spawning the uncompleted bandits in creative mode
After TFP reached to him:
  • It was too hard for him to edit/cut the video with the unauthorized content
  • It was too costly for him to edit/cut/remove the video with the unauthorized content
  • After replying "how much will you reimburse me for removing the video?" he had to lawyer-up
  • Now that he's lawyered-up he's using his community to win the trial in the public court
  • In the meantime he's still earning money and visibility from all this mess while TFP took a PR hit
I've never seen a supposedly simple guy actually acting this smart! :sneaky:
thats your perception?
reality he gave alot of people hope, showd something off tfp should have done themselves. He gave tfp credibility that they are actually working on bandits.
To me he done alot more good than harm, the fault is the stupidity of the people who couldnt see that.
 
If this is the case; and Woodle was merely asking for that tiny sum of money, or equivalent in 7dtd keys to raffle; would this mean his request was reasonable? Or would he be the devil anyway, for daring to ask something "fair"?
I agree that they should've paid him...but not to be "fair" to him (because let's face it, the vast majority of the views he gets are not because of him), but to prevent the ■■■■ storm of parasocial, reddit-brained nutjobs, that tend to jump to extremes with things like "Or would he be the devil anyway", from hurting their business.

They should've offered him $1500. $100 for the "editing" and the rest for potential lost revenue.
 
do you agree that it's peculiar that he was the ONLY streamer in his time zone to have that issue?
"Peculiar"? No. Someone's going to be Frist!. Either by discipline and work ethic, or by being a lazy bum streamer with no life other than to sit there refreshing Steam; pick whichever you think fits the muppet.
Others received the wrong version, their situations resolved differently. Whoop-de-doo. I don't to pretend to be a subject matter expert, so you need to find how many just straight up threw away their efforts, instead of asking for some recognition.

Stop implying nonsense by asking stupid questions; you're not clever enough to get away with it. Nor are you actually listening for any answers. Say what you mean, it's all opinions at this point anyway.
Post automatically merged:

They should've offered him $1500. $100 for the "editing" and the rest for potential lost revenue.
Sounds reasonable to me; cost of doing business. I might've offered 500 and 5 keys to give-away (worth what, 200, costs TFP about 5).
 
"Peculiar"? No. Someone's going to be Frist!
He wasn't first though, he was, again, the only one.
Otherwise we would have had similar cases between TFP and other streamers, right?

What's wrong with this logic? Am I missing something?
You're still denying that he's the ONLY one who had this issue among hundreds of streamers.

You're starting to resort to insults because apparently you can't answer my question, or better yet, you're implying that he wasn't the only one having the issue of receiving and playing with the wrong version, but we both know that's not true.
 
I've been monitoring Youtube for videos from other content creators regarding TFP v. Josh. "Just Rob" has come out as also having received the wrong build, and that "everybody" (not really defined) had access to it before it was pulled:
He has no proof though.

It's also a pretty good, relatively balanced breakdown of what's happened, with an explanation of both sides, Fair Use, and Transformative Content.
 
You're starting to resort to insults because apparently you can't answer my question,
No dear, it's not an insult, it's advice; you're not clever enough to get away with vagueposting, and I cba steelmanning your claims. If you make an honest claim, it'll start something like "I find it highly unlikely..." ... I won't make your claims for ya though.

He wasn't first though, he was, again, the only one.
He was the only what?
"To receive the wrong version?" No he wasn't.
"To make content out of the wrong version." We don't know that.
"To publish content out of that." Perhaps; I know of no others, but I can't say that for sure either.
"To get into a disagreement with TFP over it." As far as we know; yes.
"To get DMCA'd over it" We'd prolly heard if others have, but even that is just a chance.

See why I don't bother with vague nonsense? It takes craptons of time to type out your potential arguments, and then you'll just go "whaaa, not what I'm talking about" anyway.

Make a claim, we can discuss that. Stop vagueposting if you want to discuss with me. I don't know why you'd want to discuss with a gremlin thou?
 
Back
Top