I don't think giving a fun, friendly shout out to folks who help promote your game is a bad thing. Similar to the Thick44 Flags at Trader Compounds.
I disgree mainly because it was nice to have a reason to leave the biomes. People make the argument that you still get better loot by moving biomes but it isnt a good argument. Airdrop & Quests always give loot beyond your ability to craft (I have to turn them off & not do quests just to make the progression feel normalish) and by the time I have looted everything just from one city in a biome I have enough to make weapons or found the weapons I need.
And this is great proof that TFP can't please everyone. You've got people over in General constantly complaining that TFP scooped out most of the sand from their sandbox and want more freedom, but you're here complaining that the game should force players to have to move biomes. There's no way to please everyone.
Ces choses doivent être fix ou repensé selon moi car cela nuit a l'ambiance globale @Laz Man @faatal qu'en dite vous ? Ce genre de détails est important pour tout les jeux et pourrai faire partie des futur version expérimental genre B4, b5 ?
Que faire après que toutes les villes du biome ai été pillé ? Peut être un système de rail façon année 1800 pour ceux n'ayant pas encore de véhicule pour ce déplacer rapidement entre biome et fait par d'anciens survivant ?
Hell no. It was a poor choice then and the biome bonus are good enough reason for me to move around plus ore
Uh, go to another biome? How often does every single POI in the forest biome get looted? If you are talking about MP then have loot respawn on. And can still do quests to reset POIs if needed.
Je sais pas, c'est a voir en l'état du jeu d'ici quelques mois année, mais c'était une idée pour rendre les biome plus accessible tout simplement
Your point is fine. I just don't understand why some seem to get upset, even confrontational that some would prefer to stay in the Pine Forest and not venture into other biomes or build an underground base to feel more safe or insert your "this is the only 'true' way to play" ideology here.
So how do you think about those "majority of players" are saying that giving options to storms and biome progression is actually proof of TFP knowing "they suck" ? Else there wouldnt be the option to disable them. This minority is causing so much polarization its really sickening.
I think there are two parts to this. In your example, changes made to make them happy affect you negatively. But a lot of the people who post things concerning how other people play (nerd poling, double dipping, etc.) aren't affected by other people playing that way. So depending on what specific conversation you are talking about at a given time, both sides are right about whether or not how other people play affects you. My guess is the person you quoted was thinking about things like I mentioned.
Personally it's hard for me too tell the majority
This is very interesting, I for example have seen that some people complain that the zombies are able to swim, or break concrete blocks with their hands, or can not drive during the hordes by the vultures, because it supposedly breaks the sandbox experience, if this were changed to please them it would affect me negatively, because I would have to impose myself not to use cheese techniques, more than I already do, everyone is free to play as they want but if the game design has some rules, you have to adapt. Of course you are free to use nerdpole or other cheesse techniques, I wouldn't criticize anyone for doing so, as long as they don't want to change the game to their vision.