Are you guys over at the game studio okay?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doctor Anna from DF uses her old model. I don't know how to properly link photos here, but I'm sure you can find reference photos of her. All I can say for reference is before her outfit was a traditional medical one, and her chest was at least 4x smaller.
Well, outfit doesn't matter. And who is to say she didn't ask for some change to how she looked?

In any case, why does it matter? Let appears make characters who look however they like. Obviously there is an interest from many gamers for certain looks. And you design things to target those interests, whether you think those interests are okay or not. In the end, a guy liking someone who looks like Jen is no worse than a guy liking someone who is any other shape.
 
Well, outfit doesn't matter. And who is to say she didn't ask for some change to how she looked?

In any case, why does it matter? Let appears make characters who look however they like. Obviously there is an interest from many gamers for certain looks. And you design things to target those interests, whether you think those interests are okay or not. In the end, a guy liking someone who looks like Jen is no worse than a guy liking someone who is any other shape.

Fair enough, let's leave it at that, even if we have to agree to disagree on some things.
 
@Dark Sun: Page 2, Kyoji said, "Because statistics.... [E]ither way people who don't like these things have their own games such as Dragon Age: The Veilguard."

No statistics were included; the overblown Veilguard nonsense was dragged in to boot; and, by extension, the split in the gaming community over the supposed "liberal bias" of game development studios -- unconsciously, I think.

I'm not sure what you're asking my "position" on, but I've no position on the statistics of men and women who play video games. As for the rest, I think I've made it clear that I think the manner in which so-called politics are practiced today is a symptom of the dis-ease among us and not the disease itself as well as that we are not statistics and, when it comes to what is supposedly troubling the world and our response to it am only interested in what lies beneath -- a fragmentation of human consciousness and the wholesome "ecological" response to it in particular.

You'd think that, with all the crises (stemming from the same root) we face as a species, we wouldn't be concerning ourselves with anything appearing in video games of all things, as though video games were all- important in the face of those crises. I think someone's mentioned elsewhere in the thread that an artistic exchange of ideas occurs in well-written video games as it does in all other forms of media, but 7 Days is not an artistic expression as Fallout: New Vegas was. It's a diversion; apparently content to be a diversion; and there's nothing wrong with that. We could all use a little diversion now and then.
 
Last edited:
@Dark Sun: Page 2, Kyoji said, "Because statistics.... [E]ither way people who don't like these things have their own games such as Dragon Age: The Veilguard."

No statistics were included; the overblown Veilguard nonsense was dragged in to boot; and, by extension, the split in the gaming community over the supposed "liberal bias" of game development studios -- unconsciously, I think.

I'm not sure what you're asking my "position" on, but I've no position on the statistics of men and women who play video games. As for the rest, I think I've made it clear that I think the manner in which so-called politics are practiced today is a symptom of the dis-ease among us and not the disease itself as well as that we are not statistics and, when it comes to what is supposedly troubling the world and our response to it am only interested in what lies beneath -- a fragmentation of human consciousness and the wholesome "ecological" response to it in particular.

You'd think that, with all the crises (stemming from the same root) we face as a species, we wouldn't be concerning ourselves with anything appearing in video games of all things, as though video games were all- important in the face of those crises. I think someone's mentioned elsewhere in the thread that an artistic exchange of ideas occurs in well-written video games as it does in all other forms of media, but 7 Days is not an artistic expression as Fallout: New Vegas was. It's a diversion; apparently content to be a diversion; and there's nothing wrong with that. We could all use a little diversion now and then.
If you are going to paraphrase a quote don't do so in such a terrible way to imply negative intent. I fully explained my stance and anyone who wants to read can check. You may not agree with it because of the greater crisis facing the human population or whatever nonsense you are on about but this whole thread has gone off the rails at this point.
 
Politics and religion are not suitable topics for discussion on this forum. I acknowledge that what qualifies as political isn’t always an easy determination. But in this thread it’s pretty clear as we’ve had people refer to politics, the political left and right, conservatives and liberals, by name, as well as individual real people with political significance. As a reminder, here’s what’s prohibited in the rules.

C3. Politics & Religion​

References to figures, groups, places, or ideas with current, real world political or religious significance.
Raising these topics with strangers on an internet game forum always leads to never-ending arguments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top