PC Alpha 21 Dev Diary

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sometimes I use pois as bases. Before build my own base in the middle of nowhere. It is awesome addition that you guys gave them names, but is it possible to add a simple option, in land claim block, to name the poi we use and upgrade, and instead to be in Home of Jack Canada be in My Hive or whatever our brains invent ?
expanding on this, an option to simply remove the name and difficulty pop up when the poi is in a land claim block would be good too 😭

The ability to rename them would be sick but even just the option of it not appearing after some time would be cool!

also a question for the POI builders/renovators, if you have the time to answer: what's your workflow like on updating POIs for alpha 21 and beyond (or even just for creating new POIs)? Especially in the case of shrinking houses or buildings that are to large (or unrealistically sized)? 

 
expanding on this, an option to simply remove the name and difficulty pop up when the poi is in a land claim block would be good too 😭

The ability to rename them would be sick but even just the option of it not appearing after some time would be cool!

also a question for the POI builders/renovators, if you have the time to answer: what's your workflow like on updating POIs for alpha 21 and beyond (or even just for creating new POIs)? Especially in the case of shrinking houses or buildings that are to large (or unrealistically sized)? 


Or simply change the title to "Land Claimed"

 
Wrong. 😉

Learn by doing is literally how we have evolved as a species.
 I’m glad you are the one who is wrong about this because if students could gain new knowledge simply by repeating and practicing their current knowledge, I would be out of a job. 
 

The type of learn by doing we had in the game had nothing to do with how we have evolved as a species but it did have a lot to do with how some members of the species could become masters of skills they already had. 
 

 
I think LBD could have some place in training with firearms, agility, strength, and fortitude, but specifically with crafting and intelligence I think that the magazine system is much closer to a realistic learning curve.

 
I think that in our western culture it is a combination of both LBR and LBD. I mean we go to school for years reading and practicing things we have read.

In way, way, way back times it was probably more LBD. I would imagine someone learned how to do something by someone who knew how to do it showing them

and then they would practice it until they got good at it. Probably why we still are not 100% up on how they built the pyramids. They didn't write down the damned instructions

so that means it must have been passed on by someone showing them (I don't mean aliens)

Anyway it's a game. I play it as is. That is all.

Oh I forgot to mention, trader rekt is an ass.

 
 I’m glad you are the one who is wrong about this because if students could gain new knowledge simply by repeating and practicing their current knowledge, I would be out of a job. 
 

The type of learn by doing we had in the game had nothing to do with how we have evolved as a species but it did have a lot to do with how some members of the species could become masters of skills they already had. 
 


Well, you don't learn tennis by reading a magazine and you don't become better at it by reading more magazines.

 
I think that in our western culture it is a combination of both LBR and LBD. I mean we go to school for years reading and practicing things we have read.

In way, way, way back times it was probably more LBD. I would imagine someone learned how to do something by someone who knew how to do it showing them

and then they would practice it until they got good at it. Probably why we still are not 100% up on how they built the pyramids. They didn't write down the damned instructions

so that means it must have been passed on by someone showing them (I don't mean aliens)

Anyway it's a game. I play it as is. That is all.

Oh I forgot to mention, trader rekt is an ass.


Well, you don't learn tennis by reading a magazine and you don't become better at it by reading more magazines.


Other than quality levels of something, the game does not represent any aspect of getting better at crafting things.  So practice (LBD) isn't reflected in the game.  You could say that LBD makes sense for quality levels.  In that one area of crafting, you could realistically get better by practice (by doing).  However, practicing to make iron doesn't make you good at making steel.  Practicing making a bow doesn't make you good at making a crossbow.  If you have no schematics or anything to teach you how to make those things, then learning such things would require so much time and effort as to not fit within a reasonable timeframe within a game.  Take someone who has never made a pistol and ask them to learn how to make one by trial and error (LBD).  It won't happen.  Yes, people did come up with these designs in the past through trial and error but that process took considerable time and energy.  It wasn't done in the middle of hunting and scavenging and trying to defend against zombies every day with hordes attacking every week.  And even if it did happen that way, it wasn't done within days or weeks or even months.  Other than food recipes or clothing, pretty much anything crafted in the game required many years of study and research and learning techniques from others that are then adjusted to create a different design that wasn't known previously.  And even then, as I said, it's using information learned from others.  You are a character who presumably isn't an expert at all these different crafts.  You can't just practice your way into making something complex without prior knowledge or learning through reading or being taught.  Few people here could create a working pistol, shotgun, drone, vehicle, etc. through trial and error.  Your character isn't any different.  As I said, other than quality levels, crafting isn't about getting better through practice.  It's about learning new things that you did not previously know.  That doesn't happen just by doing.

Now... if you're talking about quality levels, then I agree that your ability to make better quality levels could come through LBD.  However, that means grinding like what they had previously and what is seen in basically any LBD game out there where LBD is used in crafting.  You have to craft a ton of stuff just to get better so you can make better things that you have to then craft more of to make even better things within the same tier.  Yes, that is realistic but it isn't great for gameplay for a lot of people.  Some people love that kind of grinding but many do not.  I can't say which side has the greater number of people on it and I doubt anyone can.  We can guess but that doesn't mean we are correct.  And in either case, there will be a lot of people on both sides, so it doesn't even matter because it's all just opinion about whether it's fun or not.  And that still only covers quality levels and not tiers or new items.

Some things may be easy to make or not require much effort to figure out how to make.  I could craft a simple workbench easily, for example.  I wouldn't need to learn how.  Granted, it wouldn't be great quality, but it would be functional.  But other things are far more complicated and require being taught or learning by reading/research into how to do the thing.  And in terms of gameplay, having all crafting follow the same mechanics is better than having some things use one mechanic and some things use another just because some items are easy enough to figure out how to craft without having been taught to do so.

So, in terms of crafting, LBR makes the most sense and is entirely realistic and provides good gameplay.  If you want to discuss other things in the game like fighting skills, that most definitely is improved through practice.  And that is actually how the game works.  You gain experience by doing.  It isn't separated into different skills and is only an overall experience but it's still experience gained through doing things in the game.  That experience is then used to get better at different things through the use of perks.  So you are use LBD to gain ability in fighting skills.  It is a bit abstracted as it is in many games rather than being tied to specific skills like you might see in some games like the Elder Scrolls games but it's still LBD.  Maybe you prefer Elder Scrolls games where if you run, you gain skill in running and if you swing a sword, you gain skill in swinging a sword.  That's fine but that's not the only way to create a game.  Most games with skills have you gain experience and that experience can be used to improve your skills.  That might be through perks or a skill tree (or both, like in Fallout) or it could be through an automatic system where all skills simply get better each time you level up.  These are all ways of using LBD in a game.

LBD simply doesn't work well for crafting.  LBR simply doesn't work well for fighting skills (though it can work for learning a new type of fighting skill).  A hybrid of LBD and LBR is the better option for games that have both fighting and crafting skills.  And we have that here.  It may not be designed all that well and is certainly nowhere close to being balanced but it is there.  Some games offer the third option of "LTBT" (Learn Through Being Taught - sorry, I can't think of a 3 letter acronym and Learn By Teaching sounds like you're doing the teaching instead of being taught, which isn't the same thing).  This is usually done through a master of some sort that you pay to unlock a skill or improve a skill.  It is sometimes the only way to gain a new skill or level of skill but in most cases, it is just an alternative and faster way to learn or improve a skill.  They could add something like that to this game but I don't really see any need for it.

People learn things in real life through a combination of LBR, LBD, and "LTBT".  But not everything can be learned by only one of these methods.  Some things require more than one method to really learn it.  And some may require all 3 to really get good at it.  If you have knowledge of the way people learn in school, you'll know that some people learn better from one method than from other methods.  Some learn best by having someone explain it to them.  Others learn best by hands on.  Others learn best by reading.  But even in those cases, it depends on what you're learning as to what method(s) are necessary to learn the skill.

One other thing to consider... yes, I could pick up a stick (club) and start swinging it around and with practice, I would probably get relatively good at hitting zombies with it.  But without anyone to teach me good technique or reading something that explains good technique, the chances I'll get to be a master with a club would be very low.  Pit me against someone who was taught how to use it and even if I spent years practicing, I probably wouldn't stand a chance.  LBD can only get you so far on its own.

 
I always thought it'd be a legendary prank if TFP announced that the new way to unlock schematics was by accessing gacha machines in which you feed premium currency (purchased with real-world money, naturally) for a chance at obtaining a common, uncommon, rare, or very rare blueprint that you may or may not already possess. Watch the debate over LBD versus LBL immediately vanish as though it never was! 

Entirely too on-the-nose, though. We just had someone in here freaking out about microtransactions based on breathless conjecture and literally nothing else. More fuel for that kind of fire would just be a massive headache for everyone. Ah, well.

 
Well, you don't learn tennis by reading a magazine and you don't become better at it by reading more magazines.


You don't learn tennis by reading a magazine simply because there are tennis instructors that impart the knowledge and that is the most effective method. But if there were no tennis instructors and you found a magazine that described the rules of tennis and how to hold the racket and different hitting techniques you certainly could learn how to play tennis a lot faster than you could by experimentation.

Once you had the knowledge you would get better at tennis through repetitive practice. It would be tougher to improve without an instructor's feedback but it could be done.

My point is that whether it is by reading, direct instruction, or watching youtube all of these fall under the LBR umbrella in that you are gaining new knowledge by appealing to an authority on the subject. Direct instruction is the most effective method while having to learn it by reading only is less effective.

For a post-apocalyptic setting it makes sense to regain lost knowledge by finding remnants of information that you can find while scavenging. It is neither stupid nor nonsensical.

Is it fun gameplay? THAT is going to be each gamer's personal opinion. 

 
Learn by doing is literally how we have evolved as a species.


Not really, but I think you acknowledge that in the rest of your post. I might not fully understand all your points.

EDIT: Well, my fear is that I reacted to that first sentence and didn't spend a lot of time reading further. Then I ran off at the mouth with the following...

LBD is certainly part of how we have learned -- You use a tool, you encounter a complication, and you have an idea for how to improve the tool. LBD also represents practicing and perfecting a skill. But that ignores that people also learn through information conveyed to them from others -- lectures, videos, books, magazines, etc. That form of learning typically precedes LBD. If folks are chasing realistic learning, then embrace both.

Personally, I look at the current system of collecting points as being a nice base to allow for both. I think their could be "skill quests" that would generate knowledge to be applied to a skill. These could have a LBD aspect, like "Cook Bacon and Eggs and earn a point in Cooking." Another approach would be to make it such that a LBD milestone had to be accomplished before a skill could move up to the next tier (a gateway task), like "Make an Iron Tool to be able to advance your knowledge to the next level."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also I was thinking about this. 

Will animals get a New update. Again.  For alpha 22+? 

I know we got one on alpha 16 and 19 but bears, deer, boars, wolf's rabbits still look like playdoe. And the animations aren't as good as the zombie dogs 

I CAN'T WAIT for it to come to console! I get to play with my work homies 

 
Wrong. 😉

Learn by doing is literally how we have evolved as a species.  For the purposes of the game and its accelerated time, LBD makes a ton more sense.  Yeh yeh it was broken in how it was implemented, you should never have been able to gain the knowledge of say, making concrete by spamming stone axes, however it's incredibly realistic to make better stone axes the more and more you make.

Hell you described LBD yourself when you said 'and many trials of failure before success is gained'.  I like that idea.  Failure chances eat the materials.  Let's do it. 

...finding what is essentially the same magazine over and over again in loot is "Learn by Reading", which would make sense in some contexts but not the more abstract materials you read over and over again the smarter you become on the subject.  All of a sudden the world is filled with magazines?  C'mon man. 😃  They should have disintegrated faster than wood rots.

The perfect system IMO would have been LBD where it makes sense (making better quality items), LBR where it makes sense (learning new skills as a baseline for later LBD), and a Skill tree to select from on character generation (old world skills you start off with as a baseline).

Making a stone axe?  Come across a "primatives" book, or try it on your own with a chance to fail rate, or start off with a skill.  Making a better stone axe?  Doing it over and over again.  Forging a scrap or even iron axe?  Find a book that teaches you basic forgery skills, then find a book that's specific to that *type* of item (not a lot of difference between forging an axe and a machete, but a far cry from forging bullets).

The good news is, we've probably got 2 more alphas left, and tfp likes to change systems entirely so... fingers crossed. 😃

Let me summarize.  LBD was the best method, it was just executed veeeery poorly, by allowing LBD to learn things not associated with the repetitive action.
Perfect system would be if... don't consider every type of weapon as equal but make them more... "realistic" - melee weapons as "saving ammo" bow and crossbow as cheap but nothing more stealth weapon while guns should be much more powerful and have more variants while much less ammo. Then  LBD could work for using weapons/tools. LBL for crafting stuff while  things like healing, barter, looting have both sources - reading and doing

Also I was thinking about this. 

Will animals get a New update. Again.  For alpha 22+? 

I know we got one on alpha 16 and 19 but bears, deer, boars, wolf's rabbits still look like playdoe. And the animations aren't as good as the zombie dogs 

I CAN'T WAIT for it to come to console! I get to play with my work homies 
I miss pigs :(

 
Is there a way to configure a game so that you get exactly one of each trader? (At work, or I'd just check it).


As far as I know there's no RWG feature that will spit out a world like that.

However, I recently wanted a map like this. I used RWG to generate a map, located the 5 traders I wanted to keep, then edited the world's prefabs.xml file to change the other trader POIs into alternative POIs. For those alternative POIs, I made some custom "dead" versions of the traders that are infested with zombies. This will ship with the next release of the ZZTong-Prefabs modlet, though they won't be rigged for RWG to find them. To use them, you'd have to edit your world's prefabs.xml file.

Example. Change this:

<decoration type="model" name="trader_jen" position="2889,33,-1845" rotation="2"/>




To this:

<decoration type="model" name="trader_jenx" position="2889,33,-1845" rotation="2"/>




Note the only difference is an "x" on the end of the name.

Note 1: Some people have done this by editing the trader POI XML files and setting a theme distance.

Note 2: I'd happily contribute those "dead" trader POIs to Teragon if that team wanted to offer such as feature. TFP is certainly able to make RWG do this if they wanted.

Note 3: I could see where some people might not want traders to be placed on Country Tiles -- that is, Gateway Tiles that are not connected to a settlement. Conversely, I could see some people might only want traders to be on Country Tiles and never on Gateways tiles that are connected to a settlement, though I suspect you might need changes to the game to support finding quests a longer ways off.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
TFP is certainly able to make RWG do this if they wanted.


The last maps I've played felt too "civilized". I don't mind long rides to the quests to slow the game down. I appreciate the effort that went into the artwork and voices for the existing traders, so I do like to have them all in the game (5 seems tolerable). A checkbox to disable traders from spawning in the Wasteland would also be welcome.

Thanks for that workaround zztong!

-Arch Necromancer Morloc 💀

 
@faatal What is the math behind the skill magazine bonus find from perks? How much does it increase with multiple points in a perk?

A friend has a new method in A21 where you max out the perk that adds a find bonus for a given magazine, then when you get up to 100 magazines use a Fergettin' Elixer and max out the next magazine perk. I thought that would just mean he'd be working on magazines in series instead of in parallel like I'm doing by spreading points around multiple perks, but he's blasted past me in every magazine. I've got about five magazines that are all middling in progression, but he's got five maxed out at the same level.

It certainly seems to work, so I'm wondering how the math scales. Linearly? Faster?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top