Recent content by Tom Stephens

  1. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    We are permitted to state what is or is not important to us, and that will stand on its own so long as it's not imposed on anyone who doesn't share it. In my view, if it's worth doing at all it's worth putting a little effort into it.  That goes for a dev studio, a modder or a gamer.  I buy...
  2. T

    PC What was the point of the water change?

    Yep, the jars out-gas from us as silane and CO2 (no PET-ting allowed).  But that kinda gas (just like methane) comes out of more than just pores.  Oh, and using or writing mods to change, add or re-introduce features to the game is by design.  Call it 'meta' if you like, but that process is WAD...
  3. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    Well now, some of us gamers follow these things because it can mean the existence or not of their favorite games.  The wary and intelligent gamer will invest the time to not just follow, but try to understand these things a little if for no other reason than to avoid projects based on the...
  4. T

    PC Is this game CPU or GPU based?

    One nice (if somewhat subtle) take-away is that small but on-going improvements in cores, along with any improvements in OS core scheduling, will continually improve performance of CPU-bound games, even if slowly going forward.  Every tic of improvement is more frames at 4K or more time between...
  5. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    That's right.  But if you pre-heat the water, let the frogs scream, then lower the temp and promise to never raise it, the frogs will jump back in.  A form of "escalate to de-escalate".
  6. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    Uh, so my bet (and I'll give even money) is the new billing is going to go out in the first second of 2024, more or less exactly as it's already been laid out. My bet is the very point of this backpedal is to buy time by appearing to relieve pressure.  Kinda like "escalate to de-escalate".
  7. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    Maybe not "unreliable", maybe actually untrustworthy.   The install fees in some form are understandable, from a certain point of view.  And maybe there were smarter ways to raise revenue.  But surreptitiously back-editing away past promises in their TOS indicates they knew they were doing...
  8. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    That third option you outline would be consistent with Unity suddenly folding in the next two quarters and leaving the engine in legal and support limbo.  Although there could be an extreme case of that that even prevents people installing as abandonware while Unity's assets get sorted out (fees...
  9. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    Agreed, to some extent.  I think the word "boycott" is a distraction.  The problem is, where does a game fit in your priorities if you suspect it has no future?  Unity appears to be in a death spiral, demanding more money for a product they can less support, and doing it in a way that screams...
  10. T

    PC Pimps should consider this option

    Are you now, considering recent events, beginning to understand why the question may have been both timely and pertinent?
  11. T

    PC Unity planning on charging developers *by individual installation* in the near future.

    Well, this is weird.  I'm having problems playing the game, now, partly because I don't know if it has a future.  And I'm having this weird moral issue even looking at the game knowing what kind of creatures the owners of the engine are. It would be nice to hear from TFP about this, how they...
Back
Top