Shouldn't you be more interested in spending time with your girlfriend than playing your game?
I'm about 30 days into an A16 run and it's not that great. It might be better with friends but solo is kinda boring. I can't play for nearly as long per session as I can with the current version.
Exactly. No matter what happens someone will be happy and someone will be unhappy and someone will be wearing hoop skirts. TFP needs to make adjustments and then move on and stick to their vision. They don’t need to redo existing features again. If they do, there is sure to be someone else wearing a cultist robe who will interrupt their incantation to point and criticize them for doing THAT again.
Have 7days on PC and PS5, so one way or another I'm always playing the game lolI'm guessing consoles can not get the V2.3 Experimental?That kind of sucks. Love you guys anyway.
Been like that for a long while now. Consoles can't have experimental builds - stable only.I'm guessing consoles can not get the V2.3 Experimental?That kind of sucks. Love you guys anyway.
Just want to add to that, this have nothing about with the Pimps as being developers of that one product called game, particularly 7 days to die.
You can always try to submit a PR mate.
If this would be open source then sure, unfortunately it is not.You can always try to submit a PR mate.
I don’t understand why some people keep questioning why others enjoyed jars and want them back. Yes, we have gas cans that don’t need to be filled or returned, but that’s irrelevant. The developers didn’t change the gas system to force players to fill gas cans, nor did they add or remove anything from it. However, they did remove jars, something many players genuinely enjoyed.Okay, so let's think about jars for a minute.
One reason given to want them is reason or immersion. If you were living in a world where zombies are walking through water and corpses are everywhere, the last thing you want to be doing is drinking water from a lake or river, regardless what you do to decontaminate it. Sure, if you have no choice, you can do it. But you are very likely to face some kind of side effects, including potential death. It would be fast safer to use a rain collector or dew collector. There are still risks there if there are any contaminants in the air, but it would tend to be a safer choice.
So from a realism perspective, a few collector trumps gathering water from a lake or river for drinking. That being said, there is no reason you couldn't use contaminated water for making glue. So gathering water from a lake or river trumps a few collector when making glue.
Now, I will agree that most people have no survival experience and many have no common sense. And most probably wouldn't know how to make a dew collector or even know what one was. So in reality, many would drink from a lake or river of there wasn't running water in houses or wherever and no jugs or bottles of water in stores or anywhere. And most would probably die because of it. So I suppose you can call it realistic to be and to do that... if they add an 80% chance to die.
Next, let's look at jars. From a realism or immersive view, it isn't at all realistic or immersive to carry around a bunch of glass jars. If you were going to gather water from a lake or river, you would use something larger... 1 gallon plastic bottles, buckets, etc. You would then carry that back to do whatever you want with it. If you were to use it for drinking water, you would decontaminate it and then put it into smaller bottles or jars or canteens and only carry a few of those around with you. So no going to a lake or river with dozens of empty jars. So from a realistic or immersive view, you wouldn't take jars there to get water. However, you would be able to bring back water in large containers that wouldn't stack.
As far as it not being immersive or realistic for them to disappear, abstraction is part of games. It isn't hard to imagine the jar is just put away into an inventory you can't see or directly interact with and then pulled out as needed (e.g. to use with a dew collector). Abstraction doesn't break immersion or reality.
I wonder how many people who want jars would be happy just being able to transport water from a water source to use of that was done without jars, such as by using a bucket? How many actually care about immersion and realism versus just wanting a way to fill hundreds of jars with water in seconds? I know some say it isn't about the jars, but if you look at all the posts yelling for jars to be brought back, it seems that most who want them want the jars more than just wanting to have immersion of being able to get water from a water source.
I wouldn't mind having the ability to get water from a lake or river using a bucket. I would not want to see about jars brought back. Those can remain abstracted. They just water space and don't really add anything to the game, imo.
I’m fine with using cans to collect water, but I don’t see how we could keep the water secure while moving around without a proper lid. Adding a can sealing station could solve this, allowing players to seal the cans and make them practical for transport. To clarify, people seem to think I’m fixated on jars, but that’s not the case. I’m fine with any container, cans, bottles, buckets, whatever, for collecting water. I just really like the jar asset’s visual design. It’s clear, crisp, and well-crafted. I wasn’t a fan of the old yellow lid, but the new silver lid looks fantastic and adds to the game’s immersive feel. I even at one point, had new jar models made for the game back when that yellow lid was still being used... had a jar just for honey because players had to use honeycomb along with a jar to store it.Why do they insist on neglecting my cans?
